-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
TST: enforce proper sklearn __init__ for classifiers
#112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
sdtemple
merged 1 commit into
lanl:main
from
tylerjereddy:treddy_issue_111_classifier_init_checks
Aug 12, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
expecteddict silently skips class-specific paramsThe loop iterates over
actual.items()and only validates a key when it appears in bothactualandexpected. Because the same dict is used for both estimators,direct_links(present inGFDLClassifierbut not inEnsembleGFDLClassifier) andvoting(present inEnsembleGFDLClassifierbut not inGFDLClassifier) each sit as a "dead" entry inexpectedfor the other estimator — they will never be reached in that estimator's test run. This means a reader scanningexpectedcannot tell which keys are actually validated for which estimator without checking both__init__signatures. Consider using per-estimator expected dicts, or iterating overexpected.items()and guarding withif k in actual, so that omissions are explicit rather than silent.