Align execution patterns and strengthen behavioral evaluations - #61
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c68d3aa22a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0593434426
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 74e8bdfef2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
1 similar comment
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 242141b04b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
1 participant
Summary
Workflow decomposition permitted isolated parallel writers while Build instructions required every slice to run sequentially. Align contracts, references and task templates: shared or unknown workspaces remain sequential; independent writers may overlap with runtime-proven isolation; dependent work waits for VERIFIED prerequisites. Full-scope validation is always required before fresh review; cross-slice validation applies when there is more than one slice.
Strengthen behavioral evaluation with observed discovery/edit and recovery evidence, matching command lifecycles, workspace-contained paths and negative controls. Check every observed small-fix file-change path, including unrelated edits later reverted. Bound that disposable case's command vocabulary to its declared read-only probe; unknown command scope remains unavailable only when independent checks reveal no failure. Validate consumed payload fields before grading, and require recovery artifact events to occur inside the recovery interval. Preserve passive reasoning, supported completion-only streams, and valid negative behavior.
Missing native parallel telemetry returns unavailable without model dispatch or success metrics. Repeated deliberate unavailable pairs no longer trip the incomplete-pair breaker; genuine incomplete runs still do. Command-only edits without authoritative timing are unavailable only when all other acceptance checks pass.
Add exact-key assertions for scheduling responses and consume each array level during schema path validation. Complete both independent response-fixture builders and keep the assertion guide within its existing context budget. Task-only prompt packets keep policy grading answers out of target inputs while annotated rendering remains the default.
Validation
4d84e04, including both Windows jobs and every framework contract shard.Evidence limits
Native end-to-end parallel execution and performance improvement are not proven. Missing isolation/overlap telemetry remains explicitly unavailable.