throwaway: validate storage main baseline rerun 2/3 — do not merge

[matthyx]

Manual validation PR — NOT for merge, will be closed after data collection.

Rerun of #957 using the same image (quay.io/matthiasb_1/storage:baseline-4535872c, kubescape/storage main pre-Lane-0). Purpose: bring the baseline sample to n=3, matching Lane 0's sample size (#956/#958/#959), so we can compare noise-floor-to-noise-floor rather than n=3-vs-n=1.

Companion runs: #956/#958/#959 (Lane 0, n=3), #957 (baseline run 1), plus one more baseline rerun.

Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LCMGT6Po2tSr1VEDVrbbYd

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

AI-skills: ralplan,plan | cmds: /compact,/usage-credits

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Updated component test deployments to use a fixed storage image and repository, improving consistency and reliability across test runs.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: ed21d5c9-eb08-42a3-b1e3-87dbb2bbd9c1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 349c642 and 1b5599e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/component-tests.yaml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The component-test workflow now installs the storage image from quay.io/matthiasb_1/storage using the fixed tag baseline-4535872c.

Changes

Component test storage image

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Helm storage image configuration .github/workflows/component-tests.yaml	The Helm upgrade command now sets the storage image repository and fixed image tag.

Priority: ⬇️ Low — Defer this throwaway test configuration because it only pins a storage image for manual baseline data collection and is not intended for merging.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 1b559

Component tests will run against the intended pinned storage baseline image. No current merge-blocking risk is identified.

Suggested reviewers: entlein

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the storage baseline validation rerun and states that the pull request is not intended for merging.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch throwaway/validate-storage-baseline-rerun2

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[matthyx]

Data collection complete — see the summary comment on kubescape/storage#399. Branch kept in case a re-check is needed.