Skip to content

chore: increase max-turns to 20 for better margin#2754

Merged
koxudaxi merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/increase-max-turns-to-20
Dec 23, 2025
Merged

chore: increase max-turns to 20 for better margin#2754
koxudaxi merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/increase-max-turns-to-20

Conversation

@koxudaxi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@koxudaxi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 281973e and 9db56e4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/release-draft.yaml
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/increase-max-turns-to-20

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.37%. Comparing base (281973e) to head (9db56e4).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2754   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.37%   99.37%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines       12233    12233           
  Branches     1467     1467           
=======================================
  Hits        12156    12156           
  Misses         45       45           
  Partials       32       32           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.37% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented Dec 23, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2754 will not alter performance

Comparing fix/increase-max-turns-to-20 (9db56e4) with main (281973e)

Summary

✅ 73 untouched
⏩ 10 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 10 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@koxudaxi koxudaxi merged commit 4579ce8 into main Dec 23, 2025
36 checks passed
@koxudaxi koxudaxi deleted the fix/increase-max-turns-to-20 branch December 23, 2025 08:35
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Breaking Change Analysis

Result: No breaking changes detected

Reasoning: This PR only modifies an internal GitHub Actions workflow configuration file (.github/workflows/release-draft.yaml), changing the --max-turns parameter from 10 to 20 for the Claude Code Action. This is purely a CI/CD infrastructure change that affects how the automated breaking change analysis workflow operates internally. It does not affect: (1) generated code output, (2) custom templates, (3) CLI options or Python API, (4) default behavior of datamodel-code-generator for end users, (5) Python version support, or (6) error handling. Users of the datamodel-code-generator library are completely unaffected by this change.


This analysis was performed by Claude Code Action

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant