Add --output-date-class option and date-time-local format support

[koxudaxi]

Fixes: #2448
Fixes: #2593

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@koxudaxi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 253bd7c and 26fcff5.

📒 Files selected for processing (26)

• docs/cli-reference/index.md
• docs/cli-reference/quick-reference.md
• docs/cli-reference/typing-customization.md
• src/datamodel_code_generator/__init__.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/__main__.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/arguments.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/cli_options.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/format.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/model/dataclass.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/model/msgspec.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/model/pydantic/types.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/model/pydantic_v2/imports.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/model/pydantic_v2/types.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/model/types.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/base.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/graphql.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/openapi.py
• src/datamodel_code_generator/types.py
• tests/data/expected/main/openapi/date_class_future_date.py
• tests/data/expected/main/openapi/date_class_past_date.py
• tests/data/expected/main/openapi/datetime_pydantic_v2_future_datetime.py
• tests/data/expected/main/openapi/datetime_pydantic_v2_past_datetime.py
• tests/data/openapi/date_class.yaml
• tests/data/openapi/datetime_local.yaml
• tests/main/openapi/test_main_openapi.py

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/datetime-date-class-options

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.36%. Comparing base (2b4af3e) to head (26fcff5).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2739   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.36%   99.36%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines       12123    12199   +76     
  Branches     1458     1463    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits        12046    12122   +76     
  Misses         45       45           
  Partials       32       32           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	99.36% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2739 will not alter performance

_{Comparing feature/datetime-date-class-options (26fcff5) with main (253bd7c)}

Summary

✅ 71 untouched
⏩ 10 skipped¹

Footnotes

1. 10 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩