Skip to content

fix: Remove unnecessary pass statement when nested class exists#2704

Merged
koxudaxi merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/remove-unnecessary-pass-with-nested-class
Dec 19, 2025
Merged

fix: Remove unnecessary pass statement when nested class exists#2704
koxudaxi merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/remove-unnecessary-pass-with-nested-class

Conversation

@koxudaxi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@koxudaxi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a31749d and 0ef750c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/datamodel_code_generator/model/template/pydantic/BaseModel.jinja2 (1 hunks)
  • src/datamodel_code_generator/model/template/pydantic_v2/BaseModel.jinja2 (1 hunks)
  • tests/data/expected/main/jsonschema/same_name_objects.py (0 hunks)
  • tests/data/expected/main/openapi/same_name_objects.py (0 hunks)
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/remove-unnecessary-pass-with-nested-class

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.43%. Comparing base (a31749d) to head (0ef750c).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2704   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.43%   99.43%           
=======================================
  Files          81       81           
  Lines       11381    11381           
  Branches     1359     1359           
=======================================
  Hits        11317    11317           
  Misses         38       38           
  Partials       26       26           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.43% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@koxudaxi koxudaxi merged commit fef6065 into main Dec 19, 2025
35 checks passed
@koxudaxi koxudaxi deleted the fix/remove-unnecessary-pass-with-nested-class branch December 19, 2025 18:20
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented Dec 19, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2704 will not alter performance

Comparing fix/remove-unnecessary-pass-with-nested-class (0ef750c) with main (a31749d)

Summary

✅ 52 untouched
⏩ 10 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 10 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant