docs: add hCaptcha beta page

[ulziibay-kernel]

Summary

• Add a concise hCaptcha beta docs page explaining the feature and how to request access.
• Link the page from the Bot Anti-Detection docs navigation.

Test plan

• ReadLints reported no diagnostics for the edited docs files.

Made with Cursor

---

Note

Low Risk
Low risk: documentation-only change that adds a new page and navigation link, with no runtime or API behavior changes.

Overview
Adds a new browsers/bot-detection/hcaptcha docs page describing the beta hCaptcha solver, what it does, and how to request access via support.

Updates docs.json navigation to include the new hCaptcha page under Advanced → Bot Anti-Detection.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ac90c51. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[firetiger-agent]

Firetiger deploy monitoring skipped

This PR didn't match the auto-monitor filter configured on your GitHub connection:

Any PR that changes the kernel API. Monitor changes to API endpoints (packages/api/cmd/api/) and Temporal workflows (packages/api/lib/temporal) in the kernel repo

Reason: PR only modifies documentation files for hCaptcha beta, with no changes to API endpoints or Temporal workflows.

To monitor this PR anyway, reply with @firetiger monitor this.

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
Kernel	🟢 Ready	View Preview	May 21, 2026, 4:53 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

[cursor]

Stale comment

Risk assessment: Very Low.

Evidence from the current diff: this PR adds one Mintlify documentation page at browsers/bot-detection/hcaptcha.mdx and one docs.json navigation entry. The update after the prior approval only changes the support link in that docs page from /info/support to /docs/info/support.

There are no production codepaths, infrastructure settings, auth/permissions logic, schemas, or shared libraries modified. I found no CODEOWNERS file requiring an owner-specific review.

The PR already has an approval from the earlier automation review. Since the synchronized change does not increase risk, I’m leaving the approval in place and not re-approving.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ac90c51. Configure here.}

[cursor]

Risk assessment: Very Low.

Evidence from the current diff: this PR adds one Mintlify documentation page at browsers/bot-detection/hcaptcha.mdx and one docs.json sidebar entry. There are no production codepaths, infrastructure settings, auth/permissions logic, schemas, prompts used for model behavior, or shared libraries modified.

I found no CODEOWNERS file requiring an owner-specific review. GitHub currently reports the PR is already approved, so I’m not adding another approval. The current update does not increase risk, so the existing approval can remain.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}