Declare MIT license in Cargo.toml (was GPL-3.0-only, contradicting LICENSE)#18
Merged
Conversation
The workspace manifest said GPL-3.0-only while the repository ships an MIT LICENSE. MIT is the intended license. Flagged by the Fedora packaging contribution (PR #13). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The workspace
Cargo.tomldeclaredGPL-3.0-onlywhile the repository ships an MITLICENSEfile (all crates inherit vialicense.workspace = true, so this is the single declaration). The intended license is MIT — this aligns the manifest with the LICENSE file.Surfaced by @jboero in #13 (Fedora packaging needs an unambiguous
License:tag). After this merges, the spec file in #13 is correct as written withLicense: MIT.🤖 Generated with Claude Code