Documentation drift report [2026-06-15]#108
Conversation
Co-authored-by: g0ldf7 <134113303+g0ldf7@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Co-authored-by: g0ldf7 <134113303+g0ldf7@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Reviewed and closed without merging. Drift reports are diagnostics, not repo artifacts — their findings have been triaged: the genuine item (README "six categories" → five scored categories) was fixed in e97cd5b. The remaining findings are acceptable VARIATIONs already adjudicated (maturity-table headers, WCAG phrasing, FR-1 wording, package version 0.1.0 vs framework v3.0), or factually incorrect (the fr1-checker image-alt finding — the check exists at fr1-checker.js:378-385). Closing to keep the repo free of redundant point-in-time snapshots. |
Generated the weekly documentation drift report comparing README.md against docs/whitepaper.md, tools/validators/fr1-checker.js, docs/implementation-guide.md, and AGENTS.md. Flagged key variations in definitions, maturity levels, and research findings, along with substantive drift regarding the scope of fr1-checker and the required quick start validation commands.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 16810669524160570688 started by @g0ldf7