Review: CCR for Azul Payara 6.38.0 — Jakarta EE Platform 10.0 - #1337
Review: CCR for Azul Payara 6.38.0 — Jakarta EE Platform 10.0#1337ivargrimstad with Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
ivargrimstad
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
See PR text and issue comment
Review complete. Summary:
Items that require your manual check (domains blocked in this sandbox): the TCK Results Summary page on |
|
@copilot re-verify |
Re-verified. All 16 SHA-256 values still match the official published
The two prior filename notes remain cosmetic only (hashes correct): Activation official file is Still not reachable from this sandbox (DNS blocked), so these need your manual confirmation: the |
Review of the compatibility certification request for Azul Payara 6.38.0 against Jakarta EE Platform 10.0, following the CCR Review Guidance. This is a review-only task; no repository files change.
Verified
jakarta-jakartaeetck-10.0.0.zipon the officialdownload.eclipse.orgbase URL; SHA-256 matches published.sha256(7874244f…08215a5e).<tck>.zip.sha256ondownload.eclipse.org.Minor issues (hashes correct, filenames mislabeled)
activation-tck-2.1.2.zip; official artifact isjakarta-activation-tck-2.1.2.zip(hash matches official).…-4.0.0.zip; provided hash146be8dc…matches official 4.0.1 (official 4.0.0 hash differs), so the correct 4.0.1 TCK was used — filename should read 4.0.1.Needs manual reviewer check (domains blocked in sandbox)
docs.payara.fish): confirm no login, product-associated/permanent, mirrors CCR detail, all tests pass with no failures.nexus.dev.payara.fish, enterprise evaluation repo): confirm version/accessibility.jakarta.ee/specifications/platform/10.Recommendation
Hashes and required TCK set check out against the Eclipse download center. Pending manual confirmation of the all-pass Results Summary and the evaluation download URL; suggest the filer correct the two filenames noted above.