Skip to content

(MOT-4187) feat(iii-directory): pass registry tags through the discovery proxy - #587

Open
rohitg00 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/registry-tags-passthrough
Open

(MOT-4187) feat(iii-directory): pass registry tags through the discovery proxy#587
rohitg00 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/registry-tags-passthrough

Conversation

@rohitg00

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Problem

Every worker's iii.worker.yaml can declare discovery tags, and the registry serves them on the worker envelope (live: GET /w/harness returns "tags": ["agent", "harness", "loop", "autonomous"]). The proxy's typed Worker model silently dropped the field on deserialization, so directory::registry::workers::list and ::info rows never carried it and mesh agents could not see or filter by tags at all.

Change

Add tags: Vec<String> to the Worker model (tolerant #[serde(default)], omitted from responses when empty, so older registry deployments and tag-less workers serialize unchanged), thread it through the one struct-literal fallback site, and name the field in the workers::info description and README field lists.

Tests

cargo fmt --check, cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings, cargo test --lib (261) pass. Field presence verified against the live registry envelope before and after: the wire serves tags, the proxy now forwards them.

Refs MOT-4187

…ery proxy

The registry envelope serves a tags array sourced from each worker's
iii.worker.yaml manifest (live: GET /w/harness returns
["agent","harness","loop","autonomous"]), but the proxy's typed Worker
model silently dropped the field, so directory::registry::workers::list
and ::info rows never carried it. Add the field (tolerant default,
omitted when empty), include it in the worker-info description's field
list, and update the README field lists.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
workers Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 24, 2026 10:01am
workers-tech-spec Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 24, 2026 10:01am

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@rohitg00, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 52 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6791690e-41f3-4b35-8e1f-ce5126f61236

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a87aa81 and 4548a1e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • iii-directory/README.md
  • iii-directory/src/functions/registry.rs
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/registry-tags-passthrough

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

skill-check — worker

0 verified, 48 skipped (no docs/).

Layer Result
structure
vale
ai
render

Four for four. Nicely done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant