Skip to content

Document native block support boundaries and correct Accordion history - #122

Merged
noeltock merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/native-block-support-boundaries
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

noeltock merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/native-block-support-boundaries

Conversation

@noeltock

@noeltock noeltock commented Sep 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

Upstream block availability, headless validity, editable fields and real WordPress behaviour are separate support claims. The Accordion benchmark description also incorrectly attributed its first Core release to 7.1. Closes #119.

Solution

Correct the attribution to WordPress 6.9 and document the tested Tabs boundary plus explicit conditions for deferred coverage. Keep expected trees and measurements unchanged.

Behaviour Read first Proof
Accordion release attribution is accurate dev/benchmarks/specs/accordion/expected.json Core's 6.9 Field Guide and direct JSON comparison
Support claims match the route and observed evidence docs/reference.md Tabs proof in #120; compatibility investigation in #121
Deferred blocks remain deferred docs/reference.md Named destination/runtime and persistence requirements for each candidate

Diff

+37 −1 · 2 files · wording only

 Accordion expected.json intent description
- first Core release: WordPress 7.1
+ first Core release: WordPress 6.9
 docs/reference.md
+ intent validity / registered composition / editable fields / runtime evidence
+ tested Tabs page-content boundary
+ explicit promotion conditions for deferred native blocks

Testing & verification

Reviewed revision: 1e26f1a · Python 3, documentation/source review.

Exact-head CI passed on Node 20.19.0/22.13.0/24.0.0, package boundary and WordPress browser proof.

Not verified: no new model benchmark, score improvement, additional block implementation, manual acceptance or release. No new tests are needed for this wording-only change.

Risk / rollout

No runtime, schema, dependency or expected-tree change. Icon, Playlist, Breadcrumbs, Gallery Grid and future proposals retain their scoped qualification requirements.

Detection: compare support wording against the child receipts and run the JSON check. Rollback: revert this PR; no migration.

@noeltock
noeltock marked this pull request as ready for review September 28, 2026 06:54
@noeltock
noeltock merged commit 81e1323 into main Sep 28, 2026
9 checks passed
@noeltock
noeltock deleted the codex/native-block-support-boundaries branch September 28, 2026 06:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Native blocks: track the September 2026 WordPress and Gutenberg catch-up

1 participant