Update GitHub Action `codecov/codecov-action` to v5.5.5 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #9008 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-07-11T00:49:33Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
codecov/codecov-action	action	patch	`v5.5.2` → `v5.5.5`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

codecov/codecov-action (codecov/codecov-action)

`v5.5.5`

Compare Source

This release only contains the keybase.io change as described here.

Full Changelog: codecov/codecov-action@v5.5.4...v5.5.5

`v5.5.4`

Compare Source

This is a mirror of v5.5.2. v6 will be released which requires node24

What's Changed

Revert "build(deps): bump actions/github-script from 7.0.1 to 8.0.0" by @thomasrockhu-codecov in #1926
chore(release): 5.5.4 by @thomasrockhu-codecov in #1927

Full Changelog: codecov/codecov-action@v5.5.3...v5.5.4

`v5.5.3`

Compare Source

What's Changed

build(deps): bump actions/github-script from 7.0.1 to 8.0.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #1874
chore(release): bump to 5.5.3 by @thomasrockhu-codecov in #1922

Full Changelog: codecov/codecov-action@v5.5.2...v5.5.3

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- "before 2am on saturday"
Automerge
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

vercel · 2026-07-11T00:49:39Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:45am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:45am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:45am

cursor · 2026-07-11T00:49:41Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
CI-only dependency pin bump with no application or test logic changes.

Overview
Bumps codecov/codecov-action from v5.5.2 to v5.5.5 in .github/workflows/test.yml for both coverage upload steps: after unit tests and after integration tests.

The action pin and comment are updated; flags, token, and step names are unchanged.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5118de4. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

codecov · 2026-07-11T00:56:37Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.73%. Comparing base (6736174) to head (5118de4).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9008   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.73%   59.73%           
=======================================
  Files        1371     1371           
  Lines      135461   135461           
  Branches     6066     6066           
=======================================
  Hits        80911    80911           
  Misses      53618    53618           
  Partials      932      932

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.39% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`6.39% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.49% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`1.90% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.02% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.18% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.89% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.19% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`7.41% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.59% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	`91.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`29.13% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`38.47% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`84.71% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`89.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.39% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`78.98% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.51% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`80.04% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.09% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`87.92% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.04% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-07-11T00:57:15Z

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

⚠️

Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 96 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]`	140.8 ns	170 ns	-17.16%
❌	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]`	185.8 ns	215 ns	-13.57%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing deps/gha/codecov-codecov-action-5.x (5118de4) with main (5a90775)}

github-actions · 2026-07-11T12:41:46Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.53 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.520 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$9.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$32.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.767 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.702 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$18.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.861 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$10.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.595 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.003 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.246 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.64 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.659 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.301 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.406 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.496 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.717 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.747 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.78 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.46 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.98 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.04 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.932 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.008 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.891 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.053 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$31.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.522 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$24.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.290 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$23.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.233 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.943 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$37.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.709 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.573 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$68.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 592 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.337 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$25.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$193 \mathrm{ms} \pm 738 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-18.581 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$7.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$7.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.437 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$7.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.177 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$7.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.676 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$7.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.840 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$7.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.594 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$8.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$8.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$8.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.525 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$8.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$8.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$8.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$8.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.647 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$8.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$8.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.347 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$8.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$8.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$8.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.278 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$8.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$6.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.567 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$85.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.200 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$49.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.749 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$57.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.224 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.538 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$69.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 489 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.573 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$57.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.238 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$39.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$48.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.545 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$48.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.287 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$416 \mathrm{ms} \pm 857 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.113 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge July 11, 2026 00:49

github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) labels Jul 11, 2026

hash-worker Bot assigned indietyp and TimDiekmann Jul 11, 2026

Update GitHub Action codecov/codecov-action to v5.5.5

5118de4

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/gha/codecov-codecov-action-5.x branch from 89ea06e to 5118de4 Compare July 11, 2026 11:30

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens July 11, 2026 11:33 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut July 11, 2026 11:36 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash July 11, 2026 11:45 View deployment

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Update GitHub Action `codecov/codecov-action` to v5.5.5#9008

Update GitHub Action `codecov/codecov-action` to v5.5.5#9008
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/gha/codecov-codecov-action-5.x

hash-worker Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

v5.5.5

v5.5.4

What's Changed

v5.5.3

What's Changed

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

Performance Changes

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

hash-worker Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`v5.5.5`

`v5.5.4`

`v5.5.3`

vercel Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading