Update tool pipx:sqlfluff to v4

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
pipx:sqlfluff (changelog)	3.4.2 → 4.2.2

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

sqlfluff/sqlfluff (pipx:sqlfluff)

v4.2.2

Compare Source

v4.2.1

Compare Source

v4.2.0

Compare Source

v4.1.0

Compare Source

v4.0.4

Compare Source

v4.0.3

Compare Source

Release 4.0.2 & 4.0.3 due to deploy issues with 4.0.1

v4.0.1.post1: [4.0.1.post1] - 2026-02-08

Compare Source

Highlights

This is a post release of 4.0.1 to fix issues in the package publish pipeline.

What’s Changed

• build: revert publish pipeline back to ubuntu-latest (#​7460) @​peterbud

v4.0.0

Compare Source

v3.5.0

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
• Automerge
  • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:51am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:51am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 11, 2026 11:51am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Major SQLFluff release may change lint/fix behavior and break CI or hooks until SQL or config is adjusted; scope is limited to the dev linter pin.

Overview
Bumps the mise-managed pipx:sqlfluff CLI from 3.4.2 to 4.2.2 in .config/mise/config.toml (a major-version upgrade).

That version is what local dev and CI use for SQL linting (sqlfluff lint in .github/workflows/lint.yml, sqlfluff fix in lefthook). No SQLFluff config or workflow changes are included in this diff.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 462d46d. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.73%. Comparing base (6736174) to head (462d46d).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8969   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.73%   59.73%           
=======================================
  Files        1371     1371           
  Lines      135461   135461           
  Branches     6066     6066           
=======================================
+ Hits        80911    80912    +1     
+ Misses      53618    53617    -1     
  Partials      932      932           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	6.39% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	1.90% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.21% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	7.41% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	29.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	38.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	78.98% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	80.04% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 96 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]	140.8 ns	170 ns	-17.16%
❌	bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]	185.8 ns	215 ns	-13.57%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing deps/tool/pipx-sqlfluff-4.x (462d46d) with main (5a90775)}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$13.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$24.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.630 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.632 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.754 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.024 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.537 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.791 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.757 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.728 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.963 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.464 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.224 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$32.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.097 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$41.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.396 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$49.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.350 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$90.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 617 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.470 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.901 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$275 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.20 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.801 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.695 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.658 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.436 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.744 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.767 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.600 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.588 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.895 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.217 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.435 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.112 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 712 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.219 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$63.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 462 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.792 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$85.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.046 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$91.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 566 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$76.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 534 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.519 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 441 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.756 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 611 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 853 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.345 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 662 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.258 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$18.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.125 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$545 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.26 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph