Skip to content

Update tool node to v24#8968

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/node-24.x
Open

Update tool node to v24#8968
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/node-24.x

Conversation

@hash-worker

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot commented Jul 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
node (source) major 22.21.1 → 24.18.0

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

nodejs/node (node)

v24.18.0: 2026-06-23, Version 24.18.0 'Krypton' (LTS), @​richardlau prepared by @​sxa

Compare Source

Notable Changes
  • [e07e7a31e1] - crypto: update root certificates to NSS 3.123.1 (Node.js GitHub Bot) #​63527
  • [44c8ebcbd6] - http: avoid stream listeners on idle agent sockets (Matteo Collina) #​64004
  • [d3ef4122ee] - (SEMVER-MINOR) buffer: increase Buffer.poolSize default to 64 KiB (Matteo Collina) #​63597
  • [bb2857b85a] - (SEMVER-MINOR) crypto: align key argument names in docs and error messages (Filip Skokan) #​62527
  • [b9d5e87880] - (SEMVER-MINOR) crypto: accept key data in crypto.diffieHellman() and cleanup DH jobs (Filip Skokan) #​62527
  • [ccd756d61e] - (SEMVER-MINOR) crypto: add TurboSHAKE and KangarooTwelve Web Cryptography algorithms (Filip Skokan) #​62183
  • [4c9251fc09] - (SEMVER-MINOR) http: add writeInformation to send arbitrary 1xx status codes (Tim Perry) #​63155
  • [8c989ec4a3] - (SEMVER-MINOR) inspector: expose precise coverage start to JS runtime (sangwook) #​63079
  • [3f54c8ba32] - Revert "stream: noop pause/resume on destroyed streams" (Stewart X Addison) #​63834
Commits

v24.17.0: 2026-06-18, Version 24.17.0 'Krypton' (LTS), @​aduh95

Compare Source

This is a security release.

Notable Changes
  • (CVE-2026-48618) tls: normalize hostname for server identity checks (Matteo Collina) – High
  • (CVE-2026-48933) crypto: guard WebCrypto cipher output length (Filip Skokan) – High
  • (CVE-2026-48615) lib,test: redact proxy credentials in tunnel errors (Matteo Collina) – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48619) http2: cap originSet size to prevent unbounded memory growth (Matteo Collina) – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48928) tls: fix case-sensitive SNI context matching (Matteo Collina) – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48930) dns,net: reject hostnames with embedded NUL bytes (Matteo Collina) – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48934) tls: bind reusable sessions to authenticated host (Matteo Collina) – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48937) deps: fix integration issues with the latest nghttp2 – Medium
  • (CVE-2026-48617) permission: handle process.chdir on writereport (RafaelGSS) – Low
  • (CVE-2026-48931) http: fix response queue poisoning in http.Agent (Matteo Collina) – Low
  • (CVE-2026-48935) permission: disable FileHandle utimes with permission model (RafaelGSS) – Low
Commits

v24.16.0: 2026-05-21, Version 24.16.0 'Krypton' (LTS), @​aduh95

Compare Source

Notable Changes
  • [b267f6bca3] - (SEMVER-MINOR) crypto: implement randomUUIDv7() (nabeel378) #​62553
  • [ec2451b9cd] - (SEMVER-MINOR) debugger: add edit-free runtime expression probes to node inspect (Joyee Cheung) #​62713
  • [9705f628d9] - (SEMVER-MINOR) fs: add signal option to fs.stat() (Mert Can Altin) #​57775
  • [40ccfdecf9] - (SEMVER-MINOR) fs: expose frsize field in statfs (Jinho Jang) #​62277
  • [d7188af5c9] - (SEMVER-MINOR) http: harden ClientRequest options merge (Matteo Collina) #​63082
  • [aa1d8a9afc] - (SEMVER-MINOR) http: add req.signal to IncomingMessage (Akshat) #​62541
  • [6f37f7e240] - (SEMVER-MINOR) stream: propagate destruction in duplexPair (Ahmed Elhor) #​61098
  • [d14029be7f] - (SEMVER-MINOR) test_runner: support test order randomization (Pietro Marchini) #​61747
  • [d142c584cd] - (SEMVER-MINOR) test_runner: align mock timeout api (sangwook) #​62820
  • [01a9552585] - (SEMVER-MINOR) test_runner: add mock-timers support for AbortSignal.timeout (DeveloperViraj) #​60751
  • [00705a459a] - (SEMVER-MINOR) util: colorize text with hex colors (Guilherme Araújo) #​61556
Commits

✂ Note

PR body was truncated to here.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge July 7, 2026 00:04
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 11, 2026 11:52am
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 11, 2026 11:52am
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 11, 2026 11:52am

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jul 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Major Node version bumps can break native addons, CI, and runtime behavior even when the diff is a single config line; validate builds and tests on Node 24.

Overview
Bumps the mise-managed Node runtime in .config/mise/config.toml from 22.21.1 to 24.18.0 (major line change to Node 24 LTS). The existing postinstall = "corepack enable" hook is unchanged, so package managers via Corepack still run after install.

This is a toolchain-only change: local dev and CI that use mise will pick up Node 24 on the next install/sync. No application source changes are in the diff.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 2db2286. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jul 7, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.73%. Comparing base (6736174) to head (2db2286).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8968   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.73%   59.73%           
=======================================
  Files        1371     1371           
  Lines      135461   135461           
  Branches     6066     6066           
=======================================
  Hits        80911    80911           
  Misses      53618    53618           
  Partials      932      932
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 6.39% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 1.90% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.19% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 7.41% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings 91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 29.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 38.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 78.98% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 80.04% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

Comparing deps/tool/node-24.x (2db2286) with main (5a90775)

Open in CodSpeed

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/tool/node-24.x branch from 7532486 to 6feb7a2 Compare July 7, 2026 01:07
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/tool/node-24.x branch from 6feb7a2 to 2db2286 Compare July 11, 2026 11:36
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$22.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.341 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002 $$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 253 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$9.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.922 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527 $$18.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 137 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.446 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52 $$2.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.527 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108 $$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.964 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.333 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.420 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.973 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2 $$1.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.605 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.37 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.875 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.84 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.643 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.369 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.371 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27 $$2.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.989 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.383 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.362 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$32.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.093 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$24.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.811 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$32.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.876 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$39.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 832 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.667 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 135 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$70.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$25.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$237 \mathrm{ms} \pm 607 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}17.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$8.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.978 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$8.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$8.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$8.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$8.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.261 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$8.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$8.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 48.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.749 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$8.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.594 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$8.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.995 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$8.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.053 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$8.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$8.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$8.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$8.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$8.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$8.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$8.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$8.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$8.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.951 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$6.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$51.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 341 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.783 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$95.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 477 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.683 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$56.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 390 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$65.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.606 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$74.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 488 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.402 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$78.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 416 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.670 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$36.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$61.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$41.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$49.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$52.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$52.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$94.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 524 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 510 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$18.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 136 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}28.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$432 \mathrm{ms} \pm 981 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.655 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@indietyp indietyp

@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@indietyp @TimDiekmann