Syntax error indicator

[jvandriel]

When I was playing around with with the demo I noticed it didn't seem to report syntax errors but instead indicated: "The input doesn't contain structured data".

Is there any chance a future update will include syntax error reporting (similar to that of Google's Rich Result Test or schema.org's validator)?

[danbri]

On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 05:56, Jarno van Driel ***@***.***> wrote: When I was playing around with with the demo I noticed it didn't seem to report syntax errors but instead indicated: *"The input doesn't contain structured data"*. Is there any chance a future update will include syntax error reporting (similar to that of Google's Rich Result Test or schema.org's validator)?

Nobody is currently working on that, but feel free

…

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#62>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABJSGML4LNC67HBTIQEYM3XHSCTBANCNFSM6AAAAAAYLUHUUY> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[ericprud]

I'm puzzled by the error report. Can you help me reproduce it?

[danbri]

The initial comment was about validator,schema.org (closed source) and enquires whether we might do syntax validation here someday I think biggest issue is detailed error reporting?

…

On Mon, 29 May 2023 at 09:00, ericprud ***@***.***> wrote: I'm puzzled by the error report. Can you help me reproduce it? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#62 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABJSGLWEKBS4473FOCLDNDXIRJQNANCNFSM6AAAAAAYLUHUUY> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[jvandriel]

My comment wasn't about validator.schema.org but about Schemarama.

I was playing around with it to try to find out what it does or doesn't do. When I modified the default example and removed a comma at the end of the second line. That's when I got the feedback: "The input doesn't contain structured data".

Code used:

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org/",
  "@id": "http://example.org/recipe"
  "@type": "Recipe",
  "name": "Mom's World Famous Banana Bread",
  "cookTime": "wwwwwwPT1H"
}

[danbri]

My bad!

…

On Mon, 29 May 2023 at 11:21, Jarno van Driel ***@***.***> wrote: My comment wasn't about validator.schema.org but about Schemarama. I was playing around with it to try to find out what it does or doesn't do. When I modified the default example and removed a comma at the end of the second line. That's when I got the feedback: *"The input doesn't contain structured data"*. Code used: { ***@***.***": "https://schema.org/", ***@***.***": "http://example.org/recipe" ***@***.***": "Recipe", "name": "Mom's World Famous Banana Bread", "cookTime": "wwwwwwPT1H" } — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#62 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABJSGJCLYSZAWXLXWBUHFLXIR2BBANCNFSM6AAAAAAYLUHUUY> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>