Reuse leading gaps in memory planner#10801
Open
teerthsharma wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
teerthsharma
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 21, 2026 06:29
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Root cause
find_value_alloc_offsetsearched gaps between coalesced live blocks and thenappended after the final block, but never considered
[0, first_live_block.start). Its single-live-block fast path always appended.This could grow the arena even when the leading interval was large enough and
free for the value's complete lifetime.
Impact
Local subgraph benchmarks on an Intel Core i7-14700HX reported:
A public-API resize/reduce witness reduced runtime workspace from 144 MiB + 32 B
to 112 MiB + 32 B with identical output hashes. This change does not alter the
planner's asymptotic complexity, and no invocation-speed change is claimed.
Validation
memory-planner-test: 23/23 passedFixes #10800