Skip to content

Bump toolkit off the archived go-iconoir - #16

Merged
tannevaled merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
drop-archived-iconoir
Aug 30, 2026
Merged

Bump toolkit off the archived go-iconoir#16
tannevaled merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
drop-archived-iconoir

Conversation

@tannevaled

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

go-iconoir is archived: the icon data is now go-icons/iconoir and the rasterising is go-gfx/gfx's svg package. This module still reached it through toolkit v0.202.0, and so did everything depending on mvvm — go-tex/engine and go-embedded-ruby/ruby cannot drop the archived module themselves because the pin is not theirs.

toolkit switched at v0.279.0; this goes to v0.288.0.

The jump moves one API the tests use: Table.SortColumn/SortAsc are now accessors returning *mvvm.Observable rather than fields — the MVVM rule applied to the toolkit's own state — so the test reads them through Get().

Verified locally: gofmt clean, go vet clean, all four packages' tests pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

go-iconoir is archived — its icon data moved to go-icons/iconoir and the
rasterising to go-gfx/gfx's svg package — and this module was still reaching it
through toolkit v0.202.0. Every module that depends on mvvm inherited that, which
is why go-tex/engine and go-embedded-ruby/ruby could not tidy the archived module
away on their own: it was not their pin to change.

toolkit switched at v0.279.0, so nothing below that is enough.

The jump moved one API this module tests: Table.SortColumn and Table.SortAsc are
now accessors returning *mvvm.Observable, not fields. That is the MVVM rule
applied to the toolkit's own state rather than an incidental rename, so the test
reads them through Get() instead of pinning the old shape.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@tannevaled
tannevaled merged commit 5d875c7 into main Aug 30, 2026
1 check passed
@tannevaled
tannevaled deleted the drop-archived-iconoir branch August 30, 2026 14:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant