fix(integrations): Prevent TypeError when integration provider is undefined - #123708
Draft
sentry[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
fix(integrations): Prevent TypeError when integration provider is undefined#123708sentry[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
sentry[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a
TypeError: undefined is not an object (evaluating 'N?.provider.key')that occurred on the integration configuration page (/settings/integrations/:providerKey/:integrationId/).The root cause was in
static/app/views/settings/organizationIntegrations/configureIntegration.tsxline 186, whereintegration?.provider.keywas used. The optional chaining only guarded againstintegrationbeing nullish, but notintegration.provider. If anintegrationobject was present (e.g., from cached data or an API response without aproviderfield) butintegration.providerwasundefined, accessing.keywould throw a TypeError.The fix involves adding an additional optional chain: changing
integration?.provider.keytointegration?.provider?.key. This ensures that the access to.keyis safely short-circuited ifintegration.providerisundefined.A new test case has been added to
configureIntegration.spec.tsxto cover this scenario, ensuring the component renders gracefully without throwing an error whenintegration.providerisundefined.Legal Boilerplate
Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. and is gonna need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this here PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.
Fixes JAVASCRIPT-3B9D
@sentry <feedback>: Autofix iterates on these changes@sentry stop iterating: Autofix stops iterating on this runThis PR was automatically generated by Sentry. You can adjust this setting at any time.