Skip to content

fix(web): polish landing separators and add README sponsors - #211

Merged
maxktz merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
feat/ui-fixes
Sep 18, 2026
Merged

maxktz merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
feat/ui-fixes

Conversation

@maxktz

@maxktz maxktz commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • align the feedback section separators
  • use the same heading separator in the sponsors section
  • cover the feedback fade edge
  • add a live Sponsors section to the README

Validation

  • Manual testing in progress

Summary by cubic

Polishes the landing page separators and hero responsiveness, and adds a live Sponsors section to the README.

  • Aligns the feedback and sponsors section dashed dividers.
  • Covers the feedback section fade edge at the bottom.
  • Reduces hero heading size and gap on narrower large screens.
  • Adds a live GitHub Sponsors image that adapts to dark and light mode.
  • Bumps pnpm from 12.4.1 to 12.4.2.

Written for commit 5bc483b. Summary will update on new commits.

Review in cubic

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added a Sponsors section to the README, including a GitHub Sponsors link and a theme-aware sponsors graphic.
  • Style

    • Improved responsive spacing and title sizing in the hero section.
    • Refined divider and fade-overlay positioning in the feedback section.
    • Updated the sponsors section with a centered divider and cleaner grid borders.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 90f0a1fa-fb55-4b09-91be-28aa3469e30f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b158de and 5bc483b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md
  • apps/web/src/components/sections/sponsors-section.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 2 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request adds sponsor content, updates sponsor-section styling, adjusts responsive hero and feedback layouts, and updates the pinned pnpm version.

Changes

Web presentation updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Sponsor content and grid styling
README.md, apps/web/src/components/sections/sponsors-section.tsx
The README adds a GitHub Sponsors section and responsive sponsor graphic. The sponsors grid uses borders on even-numbered cells, and the section adds a centered dashed divider.
Responsive hero layout
apps/web/src/components/sections/hero-section.tsx, apps/web/src/components/web/hero-title.tsx
The hero adds large-screen spacing. The heading uses a smaller size at large widths up to 1074px.
Feedback section styling
apps/web/src/components/sections/feedback-section.tsx
The divider shifts one pixel right. The bottom gradient reaches the absolute bottom edge.

Tooling version update

Layer / File(s) Summary
pnpm version pin
package.json
The pinned package manager changes from pnpm@12.4.1 to pnpm@12.4.2.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Change: Bug fix

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 5bc48

The changes are limited to presentation updates, sponsor content, and a patch-level pnpm pin with no identified merge-blocking issue.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 4 functions across 4 files. (1 skipped: 1 … Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main changes: landing-page separator polishing and the addition of README Sponsors content. It is concise and specific.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 4 functions across 4 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
📝 Generate docstrings 💡
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit sees the sponsors shine
Dashed lines mark the layout line
Hero spacing settles light
Feedback fades to edges right
pnpm hops one patch ahead

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
paykit Ready Ready Preview Sep 18, 2026 1:08pm UTC

@maxktz
maxktz marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2026 13:00

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All reported issues were addressed across 6 files

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.

Re-trigger cubic

Comment thread apps/web/src/components/sections/sponsors-section.tsx Outdated
Comment thread README.md Outdated
@maxktz
maxktz merged commit 7294ac6 into main Sep 18, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant