fix(docs): update invalid hash links in PR and moderator handbooks#1366
Conversation
Co-authored-by: majestic-owl448 <26656284+majestic-owl448@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Franciel Silveira <84150892+soumbra@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Hi @majestic-owl448, suggestion applied, thank you! I saw that you marked the comment about the 8 links as outdated, but just to clarify: the other 6 errors in the log are just warnings about local links (localhost ports). I only corrected the 2 broken markdown hashes in this PR because I considered them more important at this time. Let me know if everything looks good now! |
1 similar comment
|
Hi @majestic-owl448, suggestion applied, thank you! I saw that you marked the comment about the 8 links as outdated, but just to clarify: the other 6 errors in the log are just warnings about local links (localhost ports). I only corrected the 2 broken markdown hashes in this PR because I considered them more important at this time. Let me know if everything looks good now! |
majestic-owl448
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your contribution to the page! 👍
We are happy to accept these changes and look forward to future contributions. 🎉
Checklist:
Update index.md)Closes #1365
This PR resolves the Starlight link validation errors (
invalid hash) that occur during the local docs build.Specifically, it fixes the invalid markdown hash links in:
how-to-open-a-pull-request.mdx(updated to point to#set-up-syncing-from-parentwhich matches the actual heading in the local setup guide).moderator-handbook.mdx(updated to point to#where-can-i-get-help-if-im-stuck-on-something-not-covered-herematching the real FAQ section heading).Built the docs site locally on Fedora 43 / Chrome and verified that the
invalid hasherrors for these specific files are no longer present in the Starlight output.