Repository navigation
refactor(api): how each slice of a sweep terminated is runs.record, saved as record.parquet, so objective always means the number - #1731
Merged
Conversation
Merging this PR will not alter performance
Comparing 
Footnotes
|
FBumann
added this pull request to stack #1735
September 24, 2026 14:02
FBumann
force-pushed
the
claude/sweep-records
branch
from
September 24, 2026 17:35
8262401 to
e63e501
Compare
FBumann
force-pushed
the
claude/sweep-records
branch
from
September 24, 2026 18:57
e63e501 to
a9042a1
Compare
…aved as record.parquet, so objective always means the number Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VgkRT9Kpb2iNvL6dpV8VER
FBumann
force-pushed
the
claude/sweep-records
branch
from
September 24, 2026 21:05
a9042a1 to
e0e940c
Compare
FBumann
changed the title
fluxopt-release-bot Bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2026
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.0.1-alpha.354](v0.0.1-alpha.353...v0.0.1-alpha.354) (2026-09-25) ### Refactoring * **api:** a sweep's answer is a Sweep, read back with load_sweep and scan_sweep ([#1732](#1732)) ([24b1238](24b1238)) * **api:** how each slice of a sweep terminated is runs.record, saved as record.parquet, so objective always means the number ([#1731](#1731)) ([7c14833](7c14833)) ### Documentation * the glossary defines answers, sweeps, relations and assumptions, and no longer shows build taking a Program ([#1730](#1730)) ([25d594b](25d594b)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: fluxopt-release-bot[bot] <307443024+fluxopt-release-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note
The following content was generated by AI.
result.objectiveis a float, butruns.objectivewas a table of how each slice terminated, andobjective.parquetheld aRecord. That table is nowruns.recordand the file isrecord.parquet, matching theRecordtype and theRECORD_FILEconstant. A spilled sweep'sobjective/directory is nowrecord/.The attribute is singular to follow the sweep rule "
Result's readers, one dimension wider, under the same names", asmetricsalready does.result.record(#1738) is oneRecord, and the sweep'srecordis a table of one per slice, written asrecord.parquetbesidemetrics.parquet.This is a breaking change: an answer or archive saved before it is refused with "holds no 'record.parquet'". The layout stamp stays at 0, following its own rule ("zero while the layout is still moving").
This is stacked on the glossary PR.
Verification
ruff check,ruff format --check,pyrefly checkand the full suite (4030 passed, 319 skipped, 1 xfailed), in auvenvironment becausepixiwas not available. The tests that asserted the old names and file listings now assert the new ones; no coverage was dropped.The singular name was applied to this PR and every PR stacked on it by rebuilding each commit's tree with one scripted rename, and each rebuilt branch was re-run through the same gates. Every rebuilt commit differs from its original only on lines naming the record, apart from one line
ruff formatre-joined.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01VgkRT9Kpb2iNvL6dpV8VER