Skip to content

feat(deps): upgrade vite-plus to 0.1.14-alpha.3#1

Draft
fengmk2 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
update-vite-plus-alpha-2026-03-24
Draft

feat(deps): upgrade vite-plus to 0.1.14-alpha.3#1
fengmk2 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
update-vite-plus-alpha-2026-03-24

Conversation

@fengmk2

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Mar 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Upgrade vite-plus to 0.1.14-alpha.3
  • Upgrade @voidzero-dev/vite-plus-core (aliased as vite) to 0.1.14-alpha.3
  • Upgrade @voidzero-dev/vite-plus-test (aliased as vitest) to 0.1.14-alpha.3
  • Update pnpm overrides to match

@fengmk2 fengmk2 self-assigned this Mar 24, 2026
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on maintaining the project's dependencies by upgrading vite-plus and its associated packages to their latest alpha release. This ensures the project benefits from the newest features, bug fixes, and performance improvements offered by these updated libraries, and keeps the dependency tree healthy and current.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrades: The vite-plus package has been upgraded to version 0.1.14-alpha.3. This includes its aliased core (@voidzero-dev/vite-plus-core) and test (@voidzero-dev/vite-plus-test) components.
  • PNPM Overrides and Lockfile: The pnpm overrides for vite and vitest have been updated to reflect the new 0.1.14-alpha.3 versions. The pnpm-lock.yaml file has been comprehensively updated to reflect these changes, including numerous transitive dependency bumps for related packages like @oxc-project, @oxfmt, and @oxlint.
  • Tooling Updates: Several development tools and their bindings, such as oxfmt, oxlint-tsgolint, oxlint, cac, and tinyexec, have been updated to their latest versions as part of the dependency resolution.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request upgrades vite-plus and its related packages to an alpha version. My main concern is the use of a pre-release version, which can introduce instability. I've also noted that this upgrade results in multiple versions of @oxc-project/types in the lockfile, which is a potential area for improvement to avoid dependency bloat and potential type conflicts.

Comment thread package.json
Comment on lines +84 to +88
"vite": "npm:@voidzero-dev/vite-plus-core@0.1.14-alpha.3",
"vite-plus": "0.1.14-alpha.3",
"vitepress": "^1.6.3",
"vitepress-plugin-llms": "^1.11.0",
"vitest": "npm:@voidzero-dev/vite-plus-test@^0.1.11",
"vitest": "npm:@voidzero-dev/vite-plus-test@0.1.14-alpha.3",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Upgrading vite-plus, vite (aliased to @voidzero-dev/vite-plus-core), and vitest (aliased to @voidzero-dev/vite-plus-test) to an alpha version (0.1.14-alpha.3) introduces a risk of instability and breaking changes, even in devDependencies. Pre-release versions are not recommended for general use. Consider using stable releases unless you are intentionally testing new features or require a fix that is only available in a pre-release version.

Comment thread pnpm-lock.yaml
Comment on lines 736 to +741
'@oxc-project/types@0.115.0':
resolution: {integrity: sha512-4n91DKnebUS4yjUHl2g3/b2T+IUdCfmoZGhmwsovZCDaJSs+QkVAM+0AqqTxHSsHfeiMuueT75cZaZcT/m0pSw==}

'@oxfmt/binding-android-arm-eabi@0.40.0':
resolution: {integrity: sha512-S6zd5r1w/HmqR8t0CTnGjFTBLDq2QKORPwriCHxo4xFNuhmOTABGjPaNvCJJVnrKBLsohOeiDX3YqQfJPF+FXw==}
'@oxc-project/types@0.122.0':
resolution: {integrity: sha512-oLAl5kBpV4w69UtFZ9xqcmTi+GENWOcPF7FCrczTiBbmC0ibXxCwyvZGbO39rCVEuLGAZM84DH0pUIyyv/YJzA==}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The lockfile now includes two versions of @oxc-project/types: 0.115.0 and 0.122.0. Having multiple versions of a package, especially a types package, can increase the size of node_modules and may lead to type conflicts. It would be beneficial to investigate why the older version is retained and try to consolidate to a single version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant