Skip to content

test: add end-to-end CLI coverage - #34

Merged
fcying merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev
Aug 16, 2026
Merged

test: add end-to-end CLI coverage#34
fcying merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev

Conversation

@fcying

@fcying fcying commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ca0e4e9484

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread internal/init.go Outdated
}
line = bytes.TrimSuffix(line, []byte{'\r'})
if len(line) > limit {
lines = append(lines, buildLogLine{oversized: true, limit: limit})

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve continuation state for oversized lines

When an over-limit physical line ends in an unquoted backslash, this branch discards the line without recording that the following physical line belongs to the same shell command. mergeLogicalLines therefore parses the next line independently; for example, an oversized xxx...\\ followed by cc -c next.c can emit an entry for next.c, even though shell joining makes it part of the oversized noncompiler token and the entire logical line should be dropped. Retain enough continuation state, or skip the continued fragment, while discarding the oversized contents.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L27-L27

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codex review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

Reviewed commit: ad369d1ab4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@fcying
fcying merged commit 1582fd8 into main Aug 16, 2026
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant