Skip to content

Move empirical case studies to mncs-reference-studies - #63

Merged
epi13 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
migration/extract-reference-studies
Aug 15, 2026
Merged

Move empirical case studies to mncs-reference-studies#63
epi13 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
migration/extract-reference-studies

Conversation

@epi13

@epi13 epi13 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What was wrong

This branch had diverged from main. It carried its own copies of the execution-challenge commits that later landed as #62 with different SHAs, plus it was missing #61 and #64. A normal push looked up to date while GitHub reported ahead 3 / behind 3, so the PR could not be merged or updated cleanly.

Fix

Rebased the single migration commit onto current main (95a03ca, including the MNCDS pointer extraction). Study workflow delete/modify conflicts were resolved by keeping the deletions. Force-updated migration/extract-reference-studies.

Destination import is already merged: epi13/mncs-reference-studies#2

Changes

  • removes historical case-studies/ bodies and studies/ bodies
  • removes empirical study workflows and study-specific tooling
  • leaves a case-studies/README.md pointer to mncs-reference-studies
  • keeps normative validator, schemas, and conformance checks here
  • pytest -m "not experimental": PASS
  • mkdocs build --strict: PASS

The destination repository is now authoritative for empirical implementations.

@epi13
epi13 marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2026 03:15

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 753ed42aff

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/mncs_validator/execution_challenge.py
Comment thread src/mncs_validator/cli.py
Comment thread src/mncs_validator/execution_challenge.py
Comment thread src/mncs_validator/execution_challenge.py
Comment thread schemas/mncs-language-evidence-profile.schema.json
epi13 added 2 commits August 14, 2026 17:44
Rebase the migration onto current main, delete leftover study workflows,
and fix the docs build so mkdocs --strict no longer follows a missing
local spec path.
@epi13
epi13 force-pushed the migration/extract-reference-studies branch from 753ed42 to f939094 Compare August 15, 2026 01:47
@epi13
epi13 merged commit 06dedb1 into main Aug 15, 2026
11 checks passed
@epi13
epi13 deleted the migration/extract-reference-studies branch August 15, 2026 03:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant