docs(judge): name Bazantic in the row that already links it - #31
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The Links table already pointed at the gateway-and-recipe section, but under a label describing what it does rather than who it runs on -- so the word "Bazantic" appeared nowhere in this file. A judge from the second partner opening "For judges" and scanning for their own name found nothing, and could reasonably conclude the integration was not there. One row relabelled. No new section: this page is a 30-second read built around the Hedera claim, and a second partner does not belong in the narrative -- only in the index of things to click.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Short answer to "does JUDGE.md need Bazantic?": one word, not a section.
The Links table already pointed at the gateway-and-recipe section — but under a label describing what it does rather than who it runs on, so the string "Bazantic" appeared nowhere in the file:
A judge from the second partner opening "For judges" and scanning for their own name found nothing, and could reasonably conclude the integration wasn't there.
No new section, deliberately. This page is a 30-second read built around the Hedera claim; a second partner doesn't belong in the narrative — only in the index of things to click. Same reasoning that closed #30.
The README anchor it links (
## 🔌 The API as MCP tools — and an agent that checks the claim, README.md:449) was verified to exist.