Repository navigation
Preserve patch decisions across old and duplicate-marker histories - #107
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Outcome
Repair Python patch insertion into old histories and freeze one decision per change ID, while preserving existing consistent duplicate-marker histories and their physical cancellation boundaries.
Refs #103. Keep the issue open through published-artifact verification.
Qualification
04790ae42e8da0a83f65026f096572b547b7baa8. Corpus growth validation passes.de92f1139acdbaa9e037351dd3c46931fbb0b6efpasses every normal hosted check, including integration and target-branch qualification.2.5.16, digestsha256:d0035cbffa5b904e5f9f7f43f84f6caf03beefc93bab8731c7e960b7a344e771, accepted original histories written by published Python2.5.0. A distinct cold source-candidate worker completed both original runs once, preserving the unmarked branch and both retained duplicate markers. A new run with two patch calls completed with exactly one marker. The old process exited with code 137 before replacement. This is source qualification, with published successor verification still pending.2.5.1, paired with the actually exercised Server2.5.16. Exact release-head checks and post-publication replay/consumer verification remain required.Shared cross-SDK/embedded fixture changes remain coordinated with the Server #325 owner. This PR changes only the Python adapter and its own SDK corpus, with no Server or shared-runner edits.