feat(pricing): add Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 - #10
Merged
Conversation
Both launched at Fable 5's $10/$50 per 1M, but their cache reads are 0.025x input ($0.25) rather than the 0.1x every other row follows. Deriving the figure from the table's own multiplier note would have overcharged a cached Fable 5.1 turn four times over, so the rows carry the published number and the note records why they differ. The test pins it: "claude-fable-5-1" sits one character away from a row that costs four times as much. Mythos 5.1 comes along because the table already pairs each Fable row with its Mythos twin, and the pricing page lists both at identical rates. pricing_version bumps to 2026-09-02.1 per rule 8. Prices read from platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing on 2026-09-02.
Owner
|
Thanks — merged. The cache-read test is the part I'd have wanted most: Verified the figures against the pricing page, and checked that I'll fix First outside contribution here, and it came with a test that would catch a real mistake. Appreciated. |
dspv
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2026
One date cannot describe a table assembled from three vendors over three weeks. It said 2026-08-18 while holding non-Anthropic rows read on the 27th, Gemini rows read on the 1st, and Fable 5.1 read on the 2nd — so a reader checking any figure against the source learned nothing about that figure from the field that exists to tell them. It now names the most recent read, and a note lists the date per source. The per-row notes already carried their own dates; this makes the header stop contradicting them. Promised to @SergeAx on #10 rather than sending him round again for a field that was stale before his PR touched it. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DR8fggA2LRHcjNWUsqtDcF
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the two rows Anthropic published for Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1, and bumps
pricing_versionto2026-09-02.1(rule 8).The one thing worth reading twice
Both models cost the same as Fable 5 on input and output — $10/$50 per 1M, with $12.50/$20 cache writes — but their cache reads are 0.025x input ($0.25/MTok), not the 0.1x every other row in the table follows. Anthropic's pricing page carries it as an explicit footnote:
The table's own notes previously stated the 0.1x rule without exception, so anyone deriving
cache_readfrom it would have written $1.00 and overcharged a cached Fable 5.1 turn four times over. The note now records the exception and why those rows break the rule.TestFable51CacheReadsAtItsOwnRatepins it.claude-fable-5-1is one character away fromclaude-fable-5, whose cache reads cost 4x as much; longest-prefix-wins already resolves it correctly, and the test makes that a guarantee rather than an accident.Mythos 5.1 is included because the table already pairs every Fable row with its Mythos twin, and the pricing page lists both at identical rates.
Provenance
All figures read from https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing on 2026-09-02. Top-level
fetched_atis deliberately left at2026-08-18— see the open issue below for why bumping it would have asserted more than this PR delivers.Checks
go vet,go test ./..., UI tests, lint-ui,dist-checkandmake smokeare green. Two caveats, neither from this change:internal/opencodeTestIngestLivefails on master too (it reads a live OpenCode database:sql: Scan error on column index 1, name "c": converting NULL to float64 is unsupported).golangci-lintis not installed on this machine, solint-go's second half ran in CI only.Out of scope, but found while sourcing this — Sonnet 5 is now overcharged
The same pricing page says:
pricing.jsonstill has theuntil: "2026-08-30"row at $2/$10 and a current row at $3/$15, so every Sonnet 5 turn priced since 2026-08-31 is reported 50% high. That is a rule 6 problem in the opposite direction from the one dated rows were built to prevent. It wants its own commit — happy to open it — but it did not belong in a PR titled "add Fable 5.1".https://claude.ai/code/session_01PbAUomrYzs8MeJbd66Q1QP