Remove hard upper memory limits from FAQ and ClickHouse docs - #570
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Replace the 768GB and 1TB single-instance figures with "multi-terabyte" and drop the sentence qualifying 1TB as not "big data". Per the 2026-09-15 GTM/Prod/Eng sync, docs should not state a hard upper memory limit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Code Review by Qodo🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)
Great, no issues found!Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require reviewTip of the day💡 Did you know, you can add REVIEW.md to your repo root and Qodo follows it on every PR |
PR Summary by QodoRemove fixed memory ceilings from FAQ and ClickHouse docs
AI Description
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (2)
|
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Docs should not state a hard upper memory limit, per the GTM/Prod/Eng sync on 2026-09-15. This PR updates two pages:
docs/about/faq.md(/docs/about/faq): "scale vertically to large 768GB machines with 64 cores" now reads "scale vertically to the largest multi-terabyte machines."docs/integrations/clickhouse.md(/docs/integrations/clickhouse): "Dragonfly is able to support up to 1TB on a single instance" now reads "Dragonfly supports multi-terabyte datasets on a single instance." The sentence calling 1TB not "big data" is deleted.Related
The matching website copy changes are in dragonflydb/website-cms#278.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code