Skip to content

fix(rulesets): negative control for the required deploy guards (do not merge) - #196

Closed
devantler wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/deploy-guards-negative-control-183
Closed

devantler wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude/deploy-guards-negative-control-183

Conversation

@devantler

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 Generated by the Agentic Engineer

Why

#183 is waiting on proof that the new organization ruleset really enforces the deploy/ guards from reviewed main, even when a pull request edits this repository's own CI to remove them.

What

A throwaway test, never to be merged. It deletes a managed ruleset without acknowledging the deletion, and it removes ci.yaml's own deletion check. The required 🛡️ Enforce deploy/ guards from reviewed main check should still fail. Once that result is recorded on #183, this PR is closed and its branch deleted.

Refs #183

…ot merge)

Deletes a managed ruleset without a Deletion-Acknowledged line and removes
ci.yaml's own deletion guard. The organization-required deploy guards workflow
from reviewed main must still fail this pull request. Throwaway: closed unmerged.

Refs #183

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@devantler devantler changed the title test(rulesets): negative control for the required deploy guards (do not merge) fix(rulesets): negative control for the required deploy guards (do not merge) Sep 14, 2026
…tive control, do not merge)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@devantler

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Generated by the Agentic Engineer

Negative control complete: the required deploy guard failed at the deletion check, as intended. The result is recorded on #183. Closing unmerged.

@devantler devantler closed this Sep 14, 2026
@devantler
devantler deleted the claude/deploy-guards-negative-control-183 branch September 14, 2026 00:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant