Skip to content

chore: add AGENTS.md symlink to CLAUDE.md#36

Open
facundofarias wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/add-agents-md-symlink
Open

chore: add AGENTS.md symlink to CLAUDE.md#36
facundofarias wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/add-agents-md-symlink

Conversation

@facundofarias

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Adds AGENTS.md as a relative symlink to CLAUDE.md.

Why

AGENTS.md is the vendor-neutral standard read by Codex, Cursor, Zed, and
other agent tooling. Symlinking it to CLAUDE.md gives those tools the same
instructions Claude Code already uses, with a single source of truth and zero
duplicated content.

Notes

  • Relative symlink (AGENTS.md -> CLAUDE.md), portable across clones.
  • No content changes; CLAUDE.md remains canonical.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Adds AGENTS.md as a relative symlink to CLAUDE.md so agent tooling that
follows the vendor-neutral AGENTS.md convention (Codex, Cursor, Zed, etc.)
picks up the same instructions Claude Code reads from CLAUDE.md. Single
source of truth, no duplicated content.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 51 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0872256f-d63e-4938-8951-f9e7022240b6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ae80e2 and cbf9031.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • AGENTS.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/add-agents-md-symlink

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: cbf903151a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread AGENTS.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant