DLPX-92453 Cherry-pick Delphix commits of linux-kernel-generic for LTS upgrade - #44
Merged
Merged
Conversation
palash-gandhi
force-pushed
the
dlpx/pr/palash.gandhi/generic
branch
10 times, most recently
from
October 23, 2024 18:41
b919214 to
52c31c2
Compare
palash-gandhi
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 23, 2024 21:33
prakashsurya
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2024
jwk404
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2024
palash-gandhi
force-pushed
the
os-upgrade
branch
from
October 24, 2024 22:37
8a5662e to
436f4ae
Compare
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2024
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080594 commit 5d92c7c upstream. If the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, ata_host_release() will get called. However, the code in ata_host_release() tries to free ata_port struct members unconditionally, which can lead to the following: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000003990 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 PID: 594 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #44 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] Code: e4 4d 63 f4 44 89 e2 48 c7 c6 90 ad 32 c0 48 c7 c7 d0 70 33 c0 49 83 c6 0e 41 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000ebb968 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000041 RBX: ffff88810fb52e78 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88813b3218c0 RDI: ffff88813b3218c0 RBP: ffff88810fb52e40 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 6c65725f74736f68 R10: ffffc90000ebb738 R11: 73692033203a746e R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000011 R15: 0000000000000006 FS: 00007f6cc55b9980(0000) GS:ffff88813b300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000003990 CR3: 00000001122a2000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x2f0 ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] release_nodes+0x35/0xb0 devres_release_group+0x113/0x140 ata_host_alloc+0xed/0x120 [libata] ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata] ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci] Do not access ata_port struct members unconditionally. Fixes: 633273a ("libata-pmp: hook PMP support and enable it") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240629124210.181537-7-cassel@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <ovt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2025
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076435 [ Upstream commit 5d92c7c ] If the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, ata_host_release() will get called. However, the code in ata_host_release() tries to free ata_port struct members unconditionally, which can lead to the following: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000003990 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 PID: 594 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #44 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] Code: e4 4d 63 f4 44 89 e2 48 c7 c6 90 ad 32 c0 48 c7 c7 d0 70 33 c0 49 83 c6 0e 41 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000ebb968 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000041 RBX: ffff88810fb52e78 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88813b3218c0 RDI: ffff88813b3218c0 RBP: ffff88810fb52e40 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 6c65725f74736f68 R10: ffffc90000ebb738 R11: 73692033203a746e R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000011 R15: 0000000000000006 FS: 00007f6cc55b9980(0000) GS:ffff88813b300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000003990 CR3: 00000001122a2000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x2f0 ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] release_nodes+0x35/0xb0 devres_release_group+0x113/0x140 ata_host_alloc+0xed/0x120 [libata] ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata] ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci] Do not access ata_port struct members unconditionally. Fixes: 633273a ("libata-pmp: hook PMP support and enable it") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240629124210.181537-7-cassel@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: f6549f5 ("ata,scsi: libata-core: Do not leak memory for ata_port struct members") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Portia Stephens <portia.stephens@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2026
The xfstests' test-case generic/020 fails to execute correctly: FSTYP -- hfsplus PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hfsplus-testing-0001 6.15.0-rc4+ #8 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 1 16:43:22 PDT 2025 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 /mnt/scratch generic/020 _check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/loop50 is inconsistent (see xfstests-dev/results//generic/020.full for details) *** add lots of attributes *** check *** MAX_ATTRS attribute(s) +/mnt/test/attribute_12286: Numerical result out of range *** -1 attribute(s) *** remove lots of attributes ... (Run 'diff -u /xfstests-dev/tests/generic/020.out /xfstests-dev/results//generic/020.out.bad' to see the entire diff) The generic/020 creates more than 100 xattrs and gives its the names user.attribute_<number> (for example, user.attribute_101). As the next step, listxattr() is called with the goal to check the correctness of xattrs creation. However, it was issue in hfsplus_listxattr() logic. This method re-uses the fd.key->attr.key_name.unicode and strbuf buffers in the loop without re-initialization. As a result, part of the previous name could still remain in the buffers. For example, user.attribute_101 could be processed before user.attribute_54. The issue resulted in formation the name user.attribute_541 instead of user.attribute_54. This patch adds initialization of fd.key->attr.key_name.unicode and strbuf buffers before calling hfs_brec_goto() method that prepare next name in the buffer. HFS+ logic supports only inline xattrs. Such extended attributes can store values not bigger than 3802 bytes [1]. This limitation requires correction of generic/020 logic. Finally, generic/020 can be executed without any issue: sudo ./check generic/020 FSTYP -- hfsplus PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 hfsplus-testing-0001 6.19.0-rc1+ #44 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Dec 22 15:39:00 PST 2025 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop51 /mnt/scratch generic/020 31s ... 38s Ran: generic/020 Passed all 1 tests [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.19-rc2/source/include/linux/hfs_common.h#L626 Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251224002810.1137139-1-slava@dubeyko.com Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change cherry-picks the Delphix patch set from
developonto a branch forked off ofupstreams/os-upgrade.upstreams/os-upgradecurrently has commits from Linux kernel 6.8, the version that ships with Ubuntu 24.04. I ran the following command to perform the cherry-pick:Here's the actual diff between upstreams/os-upgrade and os-upgrade: upstreams/os-upgrade...dlpx/pr/palash.gandhi/generic
Additional changes that were required:
build-package: https://ops-jenkins.eng-tools-prd.aws.delphixcloud.com/job/linux-pkg/job/os-upgrade/job/build-package/job/linux-kernel-generic/job/pre-push/17/console
Resulting merge conflicts