Skip to content

Bazel version referenced only through .bazelversion throughout the documentation.#254

Merged
zzcgumn merged 1 commit into
developfrom
mention_only_current_bazel_version
Jul 23, 2026
Merged

Bazel version referenced only through .bazelversion throughout the documentation.#254
zzcgumn merged 1 commit into
developfrom
mention_only_current_bazel_version

Conversation

@zzcgumn

@zzcgumn zzcgumn commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

closes #236

@zzcgumn
zzcgumn requested a review from tameware July 21, 2026 13:14
@zzcgumn zzcgumn self-assigned this Jul 21, 2026

@tameware tameware left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see changes that are unrelated to .bazelversion. Does the branch need to be rebased?

The prerequisite sections named three different Bazel versions (7.x in the
Python and WASM guides, 8.x in the JNI guide) and none matched the 9.1.0
pinned in .bazelversion. Defer to that file, and recommend bazelisk, which
reads it automatically, so the docs cannot drift on the next bump.

Also replace the hardcoded 9.1.0 in the BUILD_SYSTEM.md lockfile merge-driver
URL with $(cat .bazelversion), and drop the JNI guide's claim that
MODULE.bazel.lock uses lockFileVersion 28 -- it is 26, and --lockfile_mode=error
already surfaces a mismatched Bazel.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@zzcgumn
zzcgumn force-pushed the mention_only_current_bazel_version branch from 5c82d52 to 26beba7 Compare July 23, 2026 07:50
@zzcgumn
zzcgumn requested a review from tameware July 23, 2026 07:53
@zzcgumn

zzcgumn commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I have fixed the contents of the branch.

@tameware tameware left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect!

@zzcgumn
zzcgumn merged commit 958b910 into develop Jul 23, 2026
7 checks passed
@zzcgumn
zzcgumn deleted the mention_only_current_bazel_version branch July 23, 2026 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update Documentation to not Mention Bazel 7

2 participants