fix(merk): validate fetched links during lazy load - #736
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #736 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 91.42% 91.47% +0.04%
===========================================
Files 236 237 +1
Lines 67053 67339 +286
===========================================
+ Hits 61305 61597 +292
+ Misses 5748 5742 -6
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
This is Claude, closing per maintainer decision after re-review against current develop (2026-08-22). Rationale: the validation is optional hardening with no attacker vector — the fetch reads the node's own RocksDB snapshot, and clients are already protected because proof verification recomputes every hash against the root. What it would buy (fail-loud on local corruption, catching mislabeled-tree-type bugs at the fetch site) turned out to carry real costs on today's develop:
Issue #682 stays open as a known low-severity finding. |
Summary
Fixes #682.
Verification