Update cui-parent to 1.1.0 and baseline to Java 21 - #32
Conversation
cuioss-oliver
commented
Jul 4, 2025
cuioss-oliver
commented
- Updated cui-parent to version 1.1.0 in pom.xml.
- Updated GitHub workflows to use Java 21 as the baseline.
- Removed Java 17 from the build matrix in maven.yml.
- Updated maven.compiler.source/target to maven.compiler.release in maven.yml.
- Updated cui-parent to version 1.1.0 in pom.xml. - Updated GitHub workflows to use Java 21 as the baseline. - Removed Java 17 from the build matrix in maven.yml. - Updated maven.compiler.source/target to maven.compiler.release in maven.yml.
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @cuioss, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request aims to update the project's cui-parent dependency and, according to its title, baseline the project to Java 21. My review of the provided patch indicates that the primary changes involve upgrading the cui-java-parent version in pom.xml and standardizing copyright and license headers across several Java source files. The changes related to baselining to Java 21 or modifying GitHub workflows, as mentioned in the PR description, are not present in the provided patch.
Highlights
- Dependency Update: The
cui-java-parentdependency inpom.xmlhas been upgraded from version1.0.2to1.1.0. - Copyright and License Header Standardization: Copyright and license headers have been updated and standardized across
Hello.java,module-info.java, andHelloTest.javafiles. This includes changing the copyright year to 2025, adjusting the copyright format, and updating the Apache License 2.0 URL format.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the project to use Java 21 by bumping the cui-java-parent version to 1.1.0 in pom.xml. The changes also include updates to the copyright headers in several Java files, standardizing them to Javadoc-style comments. The modifications in pom.xml and the Java source files are correct and align with the stated objectives of the PR. I found no issues of medium or higher severity in the provided diffs.
|
1 participant
