Skip to content

Add Studio Information Architecture (v3.8)#13

Draft
maxvydrin wants to merge 1 commit into
constructorfabric:mainfrom
maxvydrin:add-studio-ia
Draft

Add Studio Information Architecture (v3.8)#13
maxvydrin wants to merge 1 commit into
constructorfabric:mainfrom
maxvydrin:add-studio-ia

Conversation

@maxvydrin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Foundation artifact: the Studio IA object map (UX mental model), rooted at Organization. Adds the mind-map export (.md, ASCII tree) plus the XMind source (.xmind). Companion to STUDIO_VISION.md and STUDIO_GLOSSARY.md. Draft — pending ratification.

Foundation artifact: the Studio IA object map (UX mental model), rooted at
Organization. Adds the mind-map export (.md, ASCII tree) plus the XMind
source (.xmind). Companion to STUDIO_VISION.md and STUDIO_GLOSSARY.md.
Draft — pending ratification.

Signed-off-by: maxvydrin <max.vydrin@gmail.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@maxvydrin, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 52 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 64ece2d8-6015-4667-b5a3-340520b91415

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0f6e30a and 71aab93.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • STUDIO_INFORMATION_ARCHITECTURE.md
  • STUDIO_INFORMATION_ARCHITECTURE.xmind
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

│ │ │ ├─ Output
│ │ │ ├─ Quality gates
│ │ │ └─ Synchronisation checkpoints
│ │ ├─ Workflows

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Workflows per workspace, not per project

```
Organization
├─ Workspace
│ ├─ Project

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the workspace we may have objects (work items) which are connected to different projects. So the Project is also an object on the graph. I would say that:
Workspace has objects (work items) - Projects, Documents, Codebase, Incidents, Builds, Pull Requests (all them connected somehow) etc.
Workspace has Flows and Automations
Workspace has Monitoring
Workspace has Audit
Workspace has File browser
Workspace has Membership (teams / people)

@maxvydrin
maxvydrin marked this pull request as draft July 13, 2026 11:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants