fix(supply-chain): adopt strict minimumReleaseAge posture - #1021
Merged
Conversation
|
tylermorrisford
changed the title
valoriecarli
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Flip the pnpm age-gate from the soft fall-back to the strict posture, aligning with commercetools/nimbus#1859.
minimumReleaseAgeStrict: false -> true— no silent fall-back (or auto-generated exclude) when no version satisfies a range within the 24h gate.minimumReleaseAgeIgnoreMissingTime: true -> false— enforce the gate even when a package's registry metadata omits a publish time.No lockfile or dependency-graph change — these are resolution-policy flags only, so
--frozen-lockfilestays valid; the flip just changes how the next resolution behaves.Refs: FEC-1199 (epic FEC-964 — Supply Chain Hardening)