release: registry pointer 실패 조건을 release 문서에 고정한다#707
Conversation
후속 PR 경로에서 backend previous_deploy_image를 registry pointer로 해석할 때, pointer 부재나 canonical digest 불일치가 나면 bootstrap 승인 또는 중단이 필요하다는 점을 shared contract에 명시했다. release record와 registry의 역할도 더 분명히 적었다. Constraint: backend/frontend 운영 문서는 pointer 기반 복구와 release record 역할을 함께 설명해야 한다 Rejected: backend repo 문구만 보강 | frontend shared contract에서도 실패 조건을 동일하게 봐야 한다 Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: clean Directive: pointer 기반 복구 규칙이 바뀌면 backend dispatch 문서와 release contract를 함께 업데이트할 것 Tested: git diff --check Not-tested: workflow runtime behavior change 없음
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 56 minutes and 24 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 Walkthrough개요백엔드 배포 디스패치 및 릴리즈 레코드 계약 문서를 업데이트하여 변경 사항배포 계약 문서 명확화
예상 코드 리뷰 노력🎯 1 (간단함) | ⏱️ ~5분 관련된 가능성 있는 PR
축하 시
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
frontend 운영 문서와 shared release contract에 direct push 금지와 main 대상 PR + release label 전제를 명시했다. backend dispatch와 release record가 어떤 입력을 정상 production release로 보는지 혼동을 줄인다. Constraint: release record는 main 대상 PR과 release label이 있을 때만 정상 production 입력으로 해석돼야 한다 Rejected: contract 문서만 수정 | frontend 운영 가이드에서도 같은 금지 규칙을 보여줘야 한다 Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: clean Directive: production release 입력 규칙이 바뀌면 ops/version-management.md와 shared contract를 함께 수정할 것 Tested: git diff --check Not-tested: runtime behavior change 없음
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
ops/backend-release-dispatch.md (1)
108-108: ⚡ Quick win문구를 더 명확하게 다듬을 수 있습니다.
"must stop or require"라는 표현이 OR 조건처럼 읽힐 수 있습니다. 의도는 "배포를 중단해야 하며, 진행하려면 명시적 bootstrap 승인이 필요하다"는 의미로 보입니다.
더 명확한 표현 제안:
- "backend deployment must halt until explicit bootstrap approval is obtained"
- 또는 "backend deployment must not proceed without explicit bootstrap approval"
다만 현재 표현도 의미 전달에 문제는 없으므로 선택적으로 고려하시면 됩니다.
📝 문구 개선 제안
-- When the registry pointer is missing or no canonical digest match exists, backend deployment must stop or require explicit bootstrap approval. +- When the registry pointer is missing or no canonical digest match exists, backend deployment must halt until explicit bootstrap approval is obtained.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@ops/backend-release-dispatch.md` at line 108, The sentence "When the registry pointer is missing or no canonical digest match exists, backend deployment must stop or require explicit bootstrap approval." is ambiguous; update that sentence to explicitly state that deployment must halt and only proceed with explicit bootstrap approval — e.g., replace it with "Backend deployment must halt until explicit bootstrap approval is obtained" or "Backend deployment must not proceed without explicit bootstrap approval." Ensure the original sentence is replaced verbatim with one of these clearer alternatives in the ops/backend-release-dispatch.md content.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@ops/backend-release-dispatch.md`:
- Line 108: The sentence "When the registry pointer is missing or no canonical
digest match exists, backend deployment must stop or require explicit bootstrap
approval." is ambiguous; update that sentence to explicitly state that
deployment must halt and only proceed with explicit bootstrap approval — e.g.,
replace it with "Backend deployment must halt until explicit bootstrap approval
is obtained" or "Backend deployment must not proceed without explicit bootstrap
approval." Ensure the original sentence is replaced verbatim with one of these
clearer alternatives in the ops/backend-release-dispatch.md content.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 940c1e73-f0ac-4e08-b96d-d5d27177445f
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
ops/backend-release-dispatch.mdops/release-record-shared-contract.md
1 participant
작업 내용
metadata.previous_deploy_image가 registry pointer 해석 결과이며, release record는 audit trail이라는 역할 분리를 더 명확히 적습니다.변경 이유
dev/QA 검증 evidence
git diff --checkproduction 영향
release contract 영향
metadata.previous_deploy_image는 backend Jenkins가 registrylatest-prod/prod포인터를 해석해 채운다는 점을 유지합니다.검증 방법
git diff --check브랜치 정보
롤백 계획
known risk / not-tested
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation