Skip to content

Update dependency vitest to v4 [SECURITY]#779

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability
Open

Update dependency vitest to v4 [SECURITY]#779
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
vitest (source) ^3.1.3^4.0.0 age confidence

When Vitest UI server is listening, arbitrary file can be read and executed

CVE-2026-47429 / GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp

More information

Details

Summary

Arbitrary file can be read on Windows when Vitest UI server is listening, especially when exposed to the network.

Impact

Only users that match either of the following conditions are affected:

  • explicitly exposes the Vitest UI server to the network (using --api.host or api.host config option)
  • running the Vitest UI or Browser Mode on Windows
Details

The API handler for /__vitest_attachment__ uses the deprecated isFileServingAllowed incorrectly.
https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/eb1abf08573032a532015b999ad3501c5e89e3bb/packages/ui/node/index.ts#L77
The function expects the passed value to use cleanUrl after the check before file system related operation.
Because of this, it is possible to bypass the check by \\?\\..\\. This is not possible on Linux as Linux errors if a directory named ? does not exist.

A similar problem exists in other places as well.

That said, this isFileServingAllowed check does not actually prevent the API to be abused. Since the API has rerun feature and file write feature, it's possible to run arbitrary script by writing a script as a test file using saveTestFile and running it using rerun. This means exposing the API / Vitest UI is equivalent to giving script execution access.
On the browser mode side, there're readFile / writeFile / saveSnapshotFile. So exposing the browser mode is equivalent to giving file read / write access.

PoC
  1. Run Vitest UI
  2. Get the API token by curl http://localhost:51204/__vitest__/
  3. Run curl "http://localhost:51204/__vitest_attachment__?path=C:\\path\\to\\project\\?\\..\\..\\secret.txt&contentType=text/plain&token=$TOKEN" (TOKEN is the API token)
  4. curl shows the content of secret.txt that is outside the project directory
Mitigations

Vitest now ships two configuration flags, allowWrite and allowExec, that gate the privileged operations exploited by this vulnerability. Both are disabled by default whenever the API server is bound to a non-localhost host, ensuring that exposing the server to the network no longer implicitly grants write or execute capabilities to remote clients.

When these flags are disabled, the UI also enters a read-only mode: in-browser code editing and test file execution are turned off, removing the attack surface that allowed remote code execution. Many Browser Mode features are also disabled, like attachments, artifacts or snapshots. See browser.api.

Users who require the full interactive UI on a networked host must explicitly opt in by setting allowWrite and/or allowExec to true.

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 9.8 / 10 (Critical)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v4.1.0

Compare Source

Vitest 4.1 is out!

This release page lists all changes made to the project during the 4.1 beta. To get a review of all the new features, read our blog post.

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v4.0.18

Compare Source

   🚀 Experimental Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.0.17

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v4.0.16

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes

Note

PR body was truncated to here.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • ""
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@renovate renovate Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner June 1, 2026 23:49
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: a208dcc

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a208dcc451

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

"size-limit": "^11.2.0",
"viem": "^2.33.2",
"vitest": "^3.1.3"
"vitest": "^4.0.0"
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Update Vitest coverage provider with Vitest

In the vitest workspaces, CI runs run test --coverage in .github/workflows/ci.yml lines 236-241, so this bump also needs the V8 coverage provider to be on Vitest 4. Yarn already reports the new vitest@4.1.8 peer request as unmet because these packages still install @vitest/coverage-v8@3.1.3 from yarn.lock; when the coverage job appends --coverage, Vitest loads that incompatible 3.x provider. Please bump @vitest/coverage-v8 to the matching 4.x range in core/actions/viem-account-ledger along with this Vitest major upgrade.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
import * from '@celo/core' (csj) 1.81 KB (0%)
import * from '@celo/core' (esm) 1.56 KB (0%)

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 69.89%. Comparing base (9ff437d) to head (a208dcc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #779      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.61%   69.89%   +0.28%     
==========================================
  Files         150      117      -33     
  Lines        7075     6156     -919     
  Branches     1163     1032     -131     
==========================================
- Hits         4925     4303     -622     
+ Misses       2080     1765     -315     
- Partials       70       88      +18     
Components Coverage Δ
celocli ∅ <ø> (∅)
sdk 69.12% <ø> (ø)
wallets 73.14% <ø> (ø)
viem-sdks ∅ <ø> (∅)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants