Test canonical package hash verification - #92
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Jul 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
cbusillo/odoo-docker#66aligns the image-side producer.Context
OPW artifact run
29674807565exposed a cross-repo contract mismatch: the image-side producer hashed raw GitHub URLs, while devkit canonicalized those identities toowner/repositorybefore validatingpackages_sha256. The producer fix belongs inodoo-docker; this test prevents devkit from later accepting representation-dependent hashes as a workaround.Validation
uv run python -m unittest tests.test_artifact_provenanceuv run python -m unittest discover -s tests— 223 tests, 1 skippeduv run ruff format --check tests/test_artifact_provenance.pyuv run ruff check tests/test_artifact_provenance.pyuv run platform --helpRefs #87
Related: cbusillo/odoo-docker#66