Skip to content

docs(reflex): add calibration passport guidance - #79

Open
0xnavarro wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/reflex-calibration-passport-20260922
Open

0xnavarro wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/reflex-calibration-passport-20260922

Conversation

@0xnavarro

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Public change

Strengthens provider-neutral engine/calibration guidance for Reflex without changing any contract, recipe, fixture or hosted behavior.

Adds:

  • a versioned calibration passport tying thresholds to contract/question, engine/checkpoint, runtime/backend, primitive/cardinality, workload slice and calibration corpus/artifact;
  • explicit separation between answer-distribution probabilities and a separate correctness/selective-automation signal when an engine exposes both;
  • runtime/conversion semantic-fidelity checks before comparing latency/throughput;
  • corresponding verification guidance in the general Brida Reflex skill.

Why

A stable Reflex contract can be served by multiple engines and runtimes whose probability scales and numerical behavior differ. Schema/API compatibility is not semantic equivalence, and one engine's threshold or confidence interpretation must not silently transfer to another.

Authority / compatibility

Documentation only.

No public schema, Custom Reflex definition, use-case ID, recipe, fixture expectation, SDK API, hosted execution route, data-class rule or authority boundary changes.

Privacy / provenance review

  • provider-neutral wording only;
  • no external source attribution;
  • no private research URLs/IDs;
  • no third-party benchmark claims;
  • no engine/vendor-specific product identity.

Validation intent

  • public CI / registry validation;
  • skill structure/sync checks;
  • public-surface/full-history leak scan;
  • diff hygiene.

Release intent

  • release-impact: none
  • release-note: none
  • qa-scope: docs

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-22T20:13:58.882532Z 680e4da PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant