Skip to content

Document Java 25 support for Detect 12.1.0 - #1870

Open
zahidblackduck wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
dev/zahidblackduck/IDETECT-5251-openjdk-version-support-doc
Open

Document Java 25 support for Detect 12.1.0#1870
zahidblackduck wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
dev/zahidblackduck/IDETECT-5251-openjdk-version-support-doc

Conversation

@zahidblackduck

@zahidblackduck zahidblackduck commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

JIRA Ticket

IDETECT-5251

Description

This pull request documents official support for Java 25 (LTS) in Detect 12.1.0.

Detect 12.1.0 was tested with Oracle JDK 25.0.4 across all four basic scan types (signature, package manager, container, and binary). All scans passed without Detect level failures, following the same validation approach used for Java 21 in IDETECT-4367.

### New features

*
* Support for Java 25 has been added.

@cpottsbd cpottsbd Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we specify OpenJDK 64-bit here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As per the JEP 503, 32-bit support has been removed entirely in Java 25, and no Java 25 builds are expected for 32-bit architectures. Given that Java 25 is effectively 64-bit only, would it be reasonable to assume that "Java 25" already implies the 64-bit version? If so, do we need to explicitly document "OpenJDK 64-bit," or would that be redundant?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could just add "OpenJDK" to avoid the redundancy potential

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants