Skip to content

Comprehensive code review with prioritized backlog - #3

Open
benpeter wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
nefario/comprehensive-website-code-review
Open

Comprehensive code review with prioritized backlog#3
benpeter wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
nefario/comprehensive-website-code-review

Conversation

@benpeter

@benpeter benpeter commented Feb 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Comprehensive code review of the schamdan.de AEM Edge Delivery Services website
  • 59 actionable findings across 8 review dimensions: code quality, maintainability, performance, accessibility, security, SEO, test coverage, UX
  • 3 Critical (WCAG Level A violations), 12 High, 19 Medium, 25 Low
  • Prioritized backlog table with severity/effort for each finding
  • Execution report and working files in companion directory

Full review: docs/reviews/2026-02-11-comprehensive-code-review.md

Top 3 Priorities

  1. Accessibility (A11Y-01, A11Y-02, A11Y-03): Hamburger nav inaccessible, nav keyboard inoperable, speisen menu lacks table semantics
  2. Speisen block quality (TEST-02, UX-02, A11Y-03): Zero test coverage, no responsive breakpoints, no semantic markup
  3. Performance critical path (PERF-01, UX-01): dapreview.js unconditional import, undefined CSS variable

Test plan

  • ESLint passes clean (0 violations)
  • Stylelint passes clean (0 violations)
  • Test suite: 13/13 pass, 73.18% coverage
  • No source code modified (review-only, report files added)
  • Review report renders correctly in GitHub Markdown preview

Generated with Claude Code

59 findings across 8 dimensions (code quality, performance, accessibility,
security, SEO, test coverage, UX, maintainability) with prioritized backlog.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Signed-off-by: Ben Peter <bp@ben-peter.com>
- Fix Critical finding attribution (A11Y-01, A11Y-02, A11Y-03 not A11Y-04/05)
- Fix coverage baseline (73.18% not 77.13%, confirmed by test run)
- Normalize SEC/SEO finding ID format (remove brackets for consistency)
- Fix effort estimate for Critical fixes

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Signed-off-by: Ben Peter <bp@ben-peter.com>
Companion directory with planning, synthesis, review, and test artifacts
from the comprehensive code review orchestration.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Signed-off-by: Ben Peter <bp@ben-peter.com>
@aem-code-sync

aem-code-sync Bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hello, I'm the AEM Code Sync Bot and I will run some actions to deploy your branch and validate page speed.
In case there are problems, just click a checkbox below to rerun the respective action.

  • Re-run PSI checks
  • Re-sync branch
Commits

These EDS fragment pages (navigation bar, site footer) were appearing in
the sitemap and getting crawled by Google, triggering GSC indexing warnings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants