Skip to content

chore: copy .env.local into new worktrees - #7

Merged
beastyrabbit merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/worktreeinclude
Sep 25, 2026
Merged

beastyrabbit merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/worktreeinclude

Conversation

@beastyrabbit

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Note

🤖 Claude Opus 5.5 responding on behalf of beastyrabbit

New T3 Code worktrees start without machine-local files, so .env.local was missing there and had to be copied by hand. A committed .worktreeinclude now lists it, and the worktree setup helper copies it from the main checkout. A file is only copied when it matches the list and is gitignored, so it still never enters Git.

Verified that the pattern matches exactly the intended gitignored file in the main checkout and that .worktreeinclude itself is tracked. A gitleaks scan of the commit found nothing.

Somewhere a GPU is overheating so I don't have to think.

T3 Code worktrees start without machine-local files. List the
gitignored .env.local in .worktreeinclude so t3-worktree-setup copies it
from the main checkout.

Powered by human calories and mass GPU cycles.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-25T14:19:59.364752Z 4085d57 Manual request
🔒 Security Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-09-25T14:08:47.863325Z 4085d57 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@sonarqube-skyway-gmbh

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@beastyrabbit

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Note

🤖 Claude Opus 5.5 responding on behalf of beastyrabbit

The first security review run ended as failed without findings; retrying.

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4085d570b8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .worktreeinclude
@beastyrabbit
beastyrabbit merged commit 1e071f1 into main Sep 25, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant