-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Fix decoding error (issue 168) #169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
pevogam
wants to merge
2
commits into
avocado-framework:main
Choose a base branch
from
pevogam:multi-byte-decoding-fix
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+167
−9
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ | |
| import subprocess | ||
| import threading | ||
| import time | ||
| from codecs import getincrementaldecoder | ||
|
|
||
| from aexpect.exceptions import ( | ||
| ExpectError, | ||
|
|
@@ -56,6 +57,9 @@ | |
|
|
||
| LOG = logging.getLogger(__name__) | ||
|
|
||
| # Buffer size in byte for pipe reads | ||
| READ_BUFFER_SIZE = 1024 | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def kill_tail_threads(): | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
@@ -731,6 +735,8 @@ def _print_line(text): | |
| poller = select.poll() | ||
| poller.register(tail_pipe, select.POLLIN) | ||
| bfr = "" | ||
| decoder_class = getincrementaldecoder(self.encoding) | ||
| decoder = decoder_class(errors="ignore") | ||
| while True: | ||
| if _THREAD_KILL_REQUESTED.is_set(): | ||
| try: | ||
|
|
@@ -745,10 +751,10 @@ def _print_line(text): | |
| break | ||
| if poll_status: | ||
| # Some data is available; read it | ||
| new_data = os.read(tail_pipe, 1024) | ||
| if not new_data: | ||
| new_bytes = os.read(tail_pipe, READ_BUFFER_SIZE) | ||
| if not new_bytes: | ||
| break | ||
| new_data = new_data.decode(self.encoding, "ignore") | ||
| new_data = decoder.decode(input=new_bytes) | ||
| if not new_data: # all chars were ignored, skip round | ||
| continue | ||
| bfr += new_data | ||
|
|
@@ -901,23 +907,23 @@ def _read_nonblocking(self, internal_timeout=None, timeout=None): | |
| expect_pipe = self._get_fd("expect") | ||
| poller = select.poll() | ||
| poller.register(expect_pipe, select.POLLIN) | ||
| data = "" | ||
| data = b"" | ||
| read = 0 | ||
| while True: | ||
| try: | ||
| poll_status = poller.poll(internal_timeout) | ||
| except select.error: | ||
| return read, data | ||
| if poll_status: | ||
| raw_data = os.read(expect_pipe, 1024) | ||
| raw_data = os.read(expect_pipe, READ_BUFFER_SIZE) | ||
| if not raw_data: | ||
| return read, data | ||
| return read, data.decode(self.encoding, "ignore") | ||
| read += len(raw_data) | ||
| data += raw_data.decode(self.encoding, "ignore") | ||
| data += raw_data | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Definitely better not to decode raw data until the very end, I think this change improves the clarity and related better to the choice of naming. |
||
| else: | ||
| return read, data | ||
| return read, data.decode(self.encoding, "ignore") | ||
| if end_time and time.monotonic() > end_time: | ||
| return read, data | ||
| return read, data.decode(self.encoding, "ignore") | ||
|
|
||
| def read_nonblocking(self, internal_timeout=None, timeout=None): | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume from your comment in #168 (comment) this could be instead be turned into
replaceand thus provide the clarity you mentioned there. So let's see if we collect some feedback there on the original choices first and until then a "replace" setting here would rather be a requested change for additional improvement there here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd suggest another commit to do mass ignore->replace which could be reverted in case someone depended on the ignore.