Follow-up for the LUN/LUA core fixes - #231
Open
moretrim wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This is a follow-up to: > * Fixes for LUN/LUA core removals in Congo. which was a part of 8eb3184. Just like it, this corrects `LUA` (Luang Prabang) core removals to `LUN` (Lunda) when they concern the Congo/Zambia part of the world. A review of all `LUA` occurrences suggest that all remaining mentions really do concern Luang Prabang now.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a follow-up to:
which was a part of 8eb3184.
Just like it, this corrects
LUA(Luang Prabang) core removals toLUN(Lunda) when they concern the Congo/Zambia part of the world. A review
of all
LUAoccurrences suggest that all remaining mentions really doconcern Luang Prabang now.
I have not tested this change.