Skip to content

Route command follow-ups explicitly - #107

Merged
ariobarin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
perf/explicit-command-routing
Jul 28, 2026
Merged

Route command follow-ups explicitly#107
ariobarin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
perf/explicit-command-routing

Conversation

@ariobarin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • include the online worker deviceId in command results
  • require deviceId with commandId for status and cancellation
  • remove relay-side command-to-worker lookup state
  • keep command follow-ups routable after a relay restart while the worker remains online

Verification

  • git diff --check
  • npm run check
  • codex review --uncommitted ? clean

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
glossa Ignored Ignored Jul 27, 2026 7:53pm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: fbbabd8d08

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@ariobarin
ariobarin merged commit 4db3dc4 into main Jul 28, 2026
19 checks passed
@ariobarin
ariobarin deleted the perf/explicit-command-routing branch July 28, 2026 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant