Skip to content

OAK-12374: Update commons-collections4 to 4.6.0 - #3092

Open
reschke wants to merge 1 commit into
trunkfrom
OAK-12374
Open

OAK-12374: Update commons-collections4 to 4.6.0#3092
reschke wants to merge 1 commit into
trunkfrom
OAK-12374

Conversation

@reschke

@reschke reschke commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@reschke
reschke requested review from mbaedke and rishabhdaim August 27, 2026 09:24
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Commit-Check ✔️

@reschke

reschke commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fails with:

[ERROR] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.security.authentication.external.impl.DynamicSyncTest.testSyncedGroup -- Time elapsed: 0.197 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: Expected [autoForGroups, everyone, base] found [autoForGroups, base] expected:<3> but was:<2>
	at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
	at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:647)
	at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.security.authentication.external.impl.DynamicSyncTest.assertExpectedIds(DynamicSyncTest.java:298)
	at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.security.authentication.external.impl.DynamicSyncTest.testSyncedGroup(DynamicSyncTest.java:210)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:569)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
	at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)

@reschke

reschke commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Potentially "broken" by: apache/commons-collections#628

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant