Skip to content
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
89 changes: 89 additions & 0 deletions tests/integration/test_writes/test_optimistic_concurrency.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
# distributed with this work for additional information
# regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
# "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
# with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
# software distributed under the License is distributed on an
# "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
# specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.

import pyarrow as pa
import pytest
from pyspark.sql import SparkSession

from pyiceberg.catalog import Catalog
from pyiceberg.exceptions import CommitFailedException
from utils import _create_table


@pytest.mark.integration
@pytest.mark.parametrize("format_version", [1, 2])
def test_conflict_delete_delete(
spark: SparkSession, session_catalog: Catalog, arrow_table_with_null: pa.Table, format_version: int
) -> None:
identifier = "default.test_conflict"
tbl1 = _create_table(session_catalog, identifier, {"format-version": format_version}, [arrow_table_with_null])
tbl2 = session_catalog.load_table(identifier)

tbl1.delete("string == 'z'")

with pytest.raises(CommitFailedException, match="(branch main has changed: expected id ).*"):
# tbl2 isn't aware of the commit by tbl1
tbl2.delete("string == 'z'")


@pytest.mark.integration
@pytest.mark.parametrize("format_version", [1, 2])
def test_conflict_delete_append(
spark: SparkSession, session_catalog: Catalog, arrow_table_with_null: pa.Table, format_version: int
) -> None:
identifier = "default.test_conflict"
tbl1 = _create_table(session_catalog, identifier, {"format-version": format_version}, [arrow_table_with_null])
tbl2 = session_catalog.load_table(identifier)

# This is allowed
tbl1.delete("string == 'z'")

with pytest.raises(CommitFailedException, match="(branch main has changed: expected id ).*"):
# tbl2 isn't aware of the commit by tbl1
tbl2.append(arrow_table_with_null)


@pytest.mark.integration
@pytest.mark.parametrize("format_version", [1, 2])
def test_conflict_append_delete(
spark: SparkSession, session_catalog: Catalog, arrow_table_with_null: pa.Table, format_version: int
) -> None:
identifier = "default.test_conflict"
tbl1 = _create_table(session_catalog, identifier, {"format-version": format_version}, [arrow_table_with_null])
tbl2 = session_catalog.load_table(identifier)

tbl1.append(arrow_table_with_null)

with pytest.raises(CommitFailedException, match="(branch main has changed: expected id ).*"):
# tbl2 isn't aware of the commit by tbl1
tbl2.delete("string == 'z'")


@pytest.mark.integration
@pytest.mark.parametrize("format_version", [1, 2])
def test_conflict_append_append(
spark: SparkSession, session_catalog: Catalog, arrow_table_with_null: pa.Table, format_version: int
) -> None:
identifier = "default.test_conflict"
tbl1 = _create_table(session_catalog, identifier, {"format-version": format_version}, [arrow_table_with_null])
tbl2 = session_catalog.load_table(identifier)

tbl1.append(arrow_table_with_null)

with pytest.raises(CommitFailedException, match="(branch main has changed: expected id ).*"):
# tbl2 isn't aware of the commit by tbl1
tbl2.append(arrow_table_with_null)
Comment on lines +76 to +93
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, this shouldn't fail, but it does with the current OCC implementation, we may add a todo comment to remove it when #819 is completed, to indicate to the developer working on #1929 that it is safe to remove/update this test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @hussein-awala for jumping in here. And that's correct, once the optimistic concurrency control has been added, they should start passing (for snapshot isolation, not for serializable isolation). I've added a comment, LMKWYT