A Four-Pillar Framework for Trustworthy Cybersecurity in 5G Renewable Energy IoT Systems
EAGF jointly optimises four governance pillars — transparency, fairness, privacy, and accountability — within a single training-and-deployment lifecycle. All four scores are aggregated into a composite Trust Index that quantifies end-to-end governance readiness. The framework is evaluated on two real-world cybersecurity domains: biometric access control and IIoT intrusion detection.
Dataset: EFR (10,021 images, 158 classes) | Model: ResNet-50 (ImageNet, GroupNorm) | Seeds: 10 | Fairness metric: Recall Parity
| Metric | Baseline (M0) | EAGF (M2) | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 84.63 ± 1.03 % | 78.63 ± 2.52 % | −6.00 pp |
| Recall Parity | 0.786 ± 0.021 | 0.905 ± 0.012 | +0.119 |
| Clarity | 0.929 ± 0.028 | 0.961 ± 0.021 | +0.032 |
| Privacy | 0.243 ± 0.009 | 0.289 ± 0.012 | +0.046 |
| Accountability | 0.300 ± 0.000 | 0.983 ± 0.000 | +0.683 |
| Trust Index | 0.565 ± 0.007 | 0.785 ± 0.008 | +38.9 % |
Exact Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.002 for all pairwise comparisons.
Dataset: Edge-IIoTset (157,800 flows, 1 : 5.8 imbalance) | Model: 2-layer BiLSTM (hidden = 128) | Seeds: 5 | Fairness metric: FPR Parity
| Metric | Baseline (M0) | EAGF (M2) | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (macro) | 0.648 ± 0.025 | 0.665 ± 0.008 | +2.6 % |
| FPR Parity | 0.493 ± 0.085 | 0.771 ± 0.057 | +56.4 % |
| Clarity | 0.692 ± 0.043 | 0.739 ± 0.055 | +6.8 % |
| Privacy | 0.248 ± 0.003 | 0.248 ± 0.003 | preserved |
| Accountability | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.667 ± 0.000 | +0.667 |
| Trust Index | 0.358 ± 0.013 | 0.606 ± 0.011 | +69.3 % |
Paired t-test, t(4) = 32.6, p < 0.001. System overhead: +0.2 ms latency, +5.8 MB memory.
- No pillar is redundant — leave-one-out ablation confirms every mechanism degrades TI when removed; accountability contributes the largest single share.
- Privacy holds — DP-SGD (ε = 3) reduces MIA AUC from 0.612 to 0.541 (CS1); near-random in CS2.
- Edge-deployable — +0.2 ms latency, +5.8 MB memory; SHAP runs asynchronously (~12 ms per batch).
git clone https://github.com/aliakarma/eagf.git
cd eagf
python -m venv .venv && .venv\Scripts\activate # Windows
# source .venv/bin/activate # Linux / macOS
pip install -r requirements.txt| Case Study | Dataset | Instructions |
|---|---|---|
| CS1 — Biometric | EFR (Kaggle) | Place preprocessed arrays in data/biometric/efr_processed/. Use --demo for synthetic fallback. |
| CS2 — IIoT | Edge-IIoTset | Download CSV (~78 MB) and place at data/real_iot/edge_iiot.csv. |
See data/README.md for full preprocessing instructions.
Quick validation (single seed):
# CS1 — Biometric (demo data)
python run_eagf.py --config configs/biometric_default.yaml --seeds 42 --demo
# CS2 — IIoT
python run_full_pipeline.py --real_dataset edge_iiot --config configs/reiot_real.yaml --seeds 42Full experiments (publication results):
# CS1 — 10 seeds
python run_eagf.py --config configs/biometric_default.yaml \
--seeds 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
# CS2 — 5 seeds
python run_full_pipeline.py --real_dataset edge_iiot \
--config configs/reiot_real.yaml --seeds 42 43 44 45 46Both pipelines produce per-seed results, aggregate statistics (mean ± std, 95 % CI), ablation tables, and Pareto front visualisation (5 × 5 grid, 25 runs) under results/.
The composite governance metric aggregates all four pillars with equal weight:
TI = 0.25 × ( Clarity + Fairness + Privacy + Accountability )
| Pillar | What it measures | CS1 metric | CS2 metric |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transparency | Explanation faithfulness | SHAP fidelity (Eq. 6-7) | SHAP fidelity |
| Fairness | Group-level parity | Recall Parity (ratio) | FPR Parity (ratio) |
| Privacy | Resistance to inference attacks | β e-ε + (1-β)(1-MIA) | Same |
| Accountability | Audit trail completeness | RSA-signed logs + compliance | Same |
| CS1 — Biometric | CS2 — IIoT | |
|---|---|---|
| Model | ResNet-50 (ImageNet-pretrained, GroupNorm for Opacus, Dropout 0.3) | 2-layer Bidirectional LSTM (hidden = 128, LayerNorm head) |
| Training | 50 epochs, batch 32, cosine LR + 5-epoch warmup | 30 epochs, batch 256, cosine LR + 3-epoch warmup |
| DP-SGD | ε = 3.0, max grad norm = 1.0 | ε = 3.0, max grad norm = 1.0 |
| Convergence | Early stop: ΔTI < 0.002 over 5 epochs | Same |
| CS1 | CS2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Seeds | 42 – 51 (10 runs) | 42 – 46 (5 runs) |
| Statistical test | Exact Wilcoxon signed-rank (p = 0.002 floor) | Paired t-test, t(4) = 32.6 |
| Determinism | NumPy + PyTorch seeds fixed per run | Same |
| Early stopping | ΔTI < 0.002 over 5 epochs or ε-budget exhausted | Same |
Repository Structure
eagf/
├── run_eagf.py # CS1 biometric pipeline
├── run_full_pipeline.py # CS2 Edge-IIoTset pipeline
│
├── src/
│ ├── models/
│ │ ├── __init__.py # Model factory (build_model)
│ │ ├── resnet50.py # ResNet-50 + GroupNorm
│ │ ├── lstm.py # Bidirectional LSTM
│ │ └── tabular_mlp.py # Tabular MLP fallback
│ │
│ ├── training/
│ │ ├── eagf_trainer.py # Governance-aware training loop
│ │ ├── fairness_loss.py # Differentiable RP / FPRP loss
│ │ └── pareto_trainer.py # 5×5 Pareto front exploration
│ │
│ ├── evaluation/
│ │ ├── ablation.py # 6-variant + leave-one-out ablation
│ │ ├── statistics.py # Wilcoxon & paired t-test
│ │ ├── mia_attack.py # Yeom loss-threshold MIA
│ │ ├── audit_logger.py # RSA-SHA256 cryptographic audit
│ │ └── report_generator.py # Aggregate report generation
│ │
│ ├── metrics/
│ │ ├── clarity.py # SHAP-based clarity score
│ │ ├── fairness.py # Recall Parity, FPR Parity
│ │ ├── privacy.py # DP accounting + MIA score
│ │ ├── accountability.py # Audit + trace + compliance
│ │ └── trust_index.py # Composite Trust Index
│ │
│ ├── utils/
│ │ ├── data_loader.py # Dataset dispatcher
│ │ ├── biometric_pipeline.py # Image pipeline (CS1)
│ │ ├── edge_iiot_loader.py # Edge-IIoTset loader (CS2)
│ │ ├── preprocessing.py # Normalisation & DP noise
│ │ └── visualisation.py # Figures
│ │
│ └── baselines/
│ ├── aif360_dp_pipeline.py # AIF360 reweighing
│ ├── fairlearn_baseline.py # Fairlearn ExponentiatedGradient
│ └── joint_dp_fair_baseline.py
│
├── configs/
│ ├── biometric_default.yaml # CS1 config
│ ├── reiot_real.yaml # CS2 config
│ └── compliance_checklist*.yaml # Compliance templates
│
├── docs/
│ └── EAGF.tex # Paper source
│
├── data/ # Dataset storage (not committed)
├── results/ # Experiment outputs
└── figures/ # Generated visualisations
If you use this code in your research, please cite:
@article{jan2026eagf,
title = {{EAGF}: A Four-Pillar Ethical {AI} Governance Framework for
Trustworthy Cybersecurity in {5G} Renewable Energy {IoT} Systems},
author = {Jan, Salman and Syed, Toqeer Ali and Akarma, Ali and
Muhammad, Munir Azam and Kamal, Shahid},
year = {2026},
journal = {Under review}
}Documentation · Data Setup · Configs · License
MIT License © 2026 Ali Akarma